STRC is a resounding success: fluctuations under 10, around 8, less volatile than the S&P, with a 10-12% dividend yield, currently 12%. The issuer sells above 100 and buys below 100, and prioritizes repurchasing STRC shares over Bitcoin purchases.

STRC is a resounding success. Everyone uses digital tokens, but we want to be ready for a digital future based on digital tokens 24/7, 365 days a year.

So, I would say, simply put, that STRC's fluctuations are less than 10, they are currently around 8. It is less volatile than the S&P index, and it gets a dividend yield of between 10 and 12%, currently 12%.

Do you want to ride a civilian plane? It might be STRC . They are all different ways to reach your destination, depending on how much risk and volatility you can tolerate .

For example, we will sell STRC above 100, and we will buy it below 100. So, anyone who trades against us, you know, is probably making a mistake. And the market is now aware of that.

This is one of the reasons for the growth in liquidity, and one of the reasons for the decrease in the volatility of financial instruments. Therefore, this is a transitional phase for the company.

Okay. It wasn't pleasant, it was rather a little painful . correct. But I'm glad we got through it .

So, it's more like a primary market problem, where markets are conditioned for how you use capital. For example, if some people are confused about this , you prioritize spending money on repurchasing STRC shares, right?

you prioritize spending money on repurchasing STRC shares, right? For example , in the first week of October, you bought only 334 Bitcoins, or 28.7 million, but you spent 176.3 million to repurchase your preferred shares, which is almost six times more.

So, with regard to the liquidity and direction of the strategy , or rather the strategy itself, why is this a better use of capital?