$APP · Learn to Invest - Investors Grow · 2026-10-30
APP 按前瞻市盈率看显得便宜,约每股 336 美元的现金流折现公允价值意味着约 28% 的上行空间,不过若未来三年每年盈利预估下调 15%,它就只是估值合理。说话者预计它未来十年表现良好,并将其列入自选名单,但因自己已持有 Google 和 Meta 的广告敞口而犹豫买入;他认为靠广告价格上涨而非使用量增长带来的增长不可持续,且该业务具有周期性。
逐段跳播
在这期视频中,我们来看看这家公司“AppLovin”,其股票代码是 APP。我们会快速了解一下公司的业务,回顾一些数据,然后尝试判断 AppLovin 股票的合理价值,看看今天投资它是否值得。
In this video, we take a look at the company " AppLovin", whose stock symbol is APP. We will take a quick look at the company's business, review some figures, and then try to determine the fair value of AbbLovén's stock to see if investing in it is worthwhile today.
有意思的是,当我们看 AppLovin 股票过去一年的走势图时,会发现这只股票在过去一年里遭受了严重亏损。AppLovin 从事广告技术领域,帮助企业找到客户。
Interestingly, when we look at the graph of AbbLovén's stock performance over the course of a year, we see that the stock has suffered heavy losses during the past year. UpLovin works in the field of advertising technology, and it helps companies find customers.
想象一下,你在用手机玩游戏,有时游戏里会出现广告,可能是另一款游戏或某个具体产品的广告。这正是“AppLovin”这家公司做的事。AppLovin 的使命就是把广告主与客户连接起来。
Imagine you are using your phone and playing a game, and sometimes ads appear within the game, which may be for another game or a specific product. This is exactly what the company "Up Lovin" does.
" Ab Lovin's" mission is to connect advertisers with customers.
如果你有一家企业,想让人下载你的游戏,你可能会在另一款游戏里投放广告,让用户点击并下载你的游戏。他们看了游戏的演示,说“哦,这游戏太棒了”,然后就下载了。那么,为此付钱的是广告主。
为了简化数字,我们假设广告主付了100美元。根据我的研究,AppLovin 似乎会从这笔广告费中留下大约30到40美元,在这个例子里,我们就说60到70美元会归投放广告的那款应用。
比如你在玩“Wordle”这款游戏时出现了一则广告,“Wordle”会拿到60到70美元,而 AppLovin 会拿到剩下的30美元。这30美元基本上就是公司的收入。
If you have a business and want people to download your game, you might advertise it within another game, so that users click on it and download your game. They watch a demo of the game and say, "Oh, this game is amazing."
Then they download it. Well, the advertiser is the one who will pay for that. To simplify the numbers, let's assume the advertiser paid $100. Based on my research , it appears that "UpLovin" keeps about $30 to $40 of that advertising money, and in this example, let's say $60 to $70 will go to the app that the ad was running on .
If you are playing, for example, the game "Wordle" and an advertisement appears, "Wordle" will receive $60 to $70, while " ApLovin" will receive the remaining $30. Those $30 is practically the company's revenue.
看这张图,我在回顾公司过去一年发生了什么时重点研究的一点是,这主要关乎预期。投资者此前一直预期公司会持续高速增长,而最近,无论是出于对人工智能的担忧,还是对 Meta 等竞争对手的担忧,AppLovin 所在领域有很多公司在竞争。
所以问题是:它们能像投资者最初预期的那样增长吗?投资者显然对此存疑,因此股价大幅下跌。
Looking at this chart, one of the key things I looked into while reviewing what happened to the company over the past year is that it is primarily about expectations. Investors had been expecting continued high-speed growth , and recently, whether due to concerns about artificial intelligence or competition, such as Meta and others, there are many companies competing in the field of AppLovin's work.
So, the question is: can they grow as much as investors initially expected? Investors clearly doubt this, so the stock price has fallen sharply.
话虽如此,接下来我们来看一些实际数据,因为比如当我们看 AppLovin 的收入时,会发现它增长得不错。不过,看这些收入,我其实认为这更多说明投资者此前预期过于乐观。因为正如我们所见,他们在两年内收入几乎增长了两倍,这很好,但投资者原本期望更多。
Now, having said that, let's move on to look at some actual figures, because when we look, for example , at AppLovin's revenue, we find that it has grown well. Now, looking at these revenues, I actually think this indicates more about the overly optimistic expectations that investors had previously.
Because, as we can see, they have almost tripled their revenue in two years, which is good, but investors were expecting more.
接下来我们看营业利润这类指标,它衡量的是收入中有多大比例转化为营业利润,你可以看到这些数字攀升得很漂亮。你希望这些数字更高,越高对投资者越有利。这些数字表现相当不错。我们再看净利润率,情况也一样。
净利润率表现也不错,但同样,投资者似乎对整个情况并不满意。
And when we move on to look at something like operating profit, which measures the percentage of revenue that turns into operating income, well , you can see that these numbers climb nicely.
You want these numbers to be higher. The higher it is, the better for investors. The numbers performed fairly well . The same applies when we move on to look at net income margins.
Net income margins also performed well, but again, investors seemed dissatisfied with the whole thing.
但现在,故事变得有点意思了,因为在8月 AppLovin 公布财报时,他们解释说收入实际上增长了不少。我们在收入上看到了这一点,在营业利润上也看到了。但其中一个原因并不是他们使用量的增长,而是广告成本的上涨。
所以,广告成本上升了,顺便说一句,这会反映在利润里。这在一定程度上解释了为什么我们看到了更高的净利润。问题在于,这不可能无限期地上涨。你没法再进一步压榨广告主了,而且人们非常担心,广告使用量本身未必在增长,而是通胀在推高它。
我的意思是,这不仅仅是通胀,但基本上是一回事。如果是这样,那这就不是真正可持续的。这不是一个可持续的商业模式,这也部分解释了为什么这只股票经历了如此大幅的下跌。
But now, here's where the story gets a bit interesting , because in August when AppLovin announced its earnings, they explained that revenue had actually grown by a good amount.
We saw that in the revenue. We saw that in operating income. But one of the reasons wasn't really growth in the volume of use they had , but rather growth in the cost of advertising.
So , the cost of advertising has increased, which, by the way, will be reflected in profits. This partially explains why we are seeing higher net income . The problem with that is that this cannot continue to rise indefinitely.
You can't squeeze advertisers any more than that, and there's a great deal of fear that advertising usage itself wasn't necessarily increasing, but rather that inflation was driving it up.
I mean, it was more than just inflation, but basically it's the same thing. If this is the case, then this is not truly sustainable. It is not a sustainable business model, which also partly explains why the stock has experienced such a significant decline.
现在,我还应该指出,在8月的同一时期,AppLovin 也被曝出对其数据收集政策存在疑问。他们否认有任何不当行为。这在我意料之中,大多数公司都会如此。美国证券交易委员会对他们进行了调查,但我没能找到关于他们的明确结论。
似乎没有实物证据能证明他们有罪。似乎也没有产生什么结果,但无论如何,这肯定无助于改善市场对这只股票的情绪。
Now , I should also point out that in the same time period in August, AppLovin also reported having questions about their data collection policies. They denied committing any wrongdoing.
As I expected from them , and as most companies do. The Securities and Exchange Commission investigated them, but I was unable to find a definitive conclusion regarding them. It seemed as though there was no physical evidence to incriminate them.
Nothing seemed to have resulted from it , but in either case, it certainly did not help improve sentiment towards the stock.
所以,他们面对了相当多的坏消息,导致了这次相当大幅的下跌,尽管他们的收入和利润都有增长,而且你知道吗?如果他们能做好把广告主与客户连接起来这件事,他们很可能会继续增长。这是他们的主要方向之一,而且他们做得相当不错,尤其是在引入人工智能、利用“这个客户最有可能下载你新做的游戏”这一思路上。
所以,你投放广告,他们就能把你和这些客户连接起来,据我了解,他们的转化率相当不错。
So, they faced a fair amount of bad news that caused this rather significant decline , despite the fact that they saw an increase in revenue and profits, and you know what? They are likely to continue to grow if they can do a good job of connecting advertisers with customers.
That was one of their major directions, and they did quite well, especially with their introduction of artificial intelligence and taking advantage of the idea that "this customer is the most likely to download the new game you created" .
So, you advertise and they can connect you with them, and as far as I understand, they had a fairly good conversion rate.
我看了不同尝试使用它的人。我试着看了些视频,也采访了几个实际用过这个应用的人,看起来,是的,这是一个非常好的应用。从广告角度看,你花的钱能获得很好的价值。而且我交谈的那位正在投广告的人,他在 Google 上大量投放广告,在 Meta 上投放,在 AppLovin 和其他一些平台上投放。
但在这两种情况下,他都说 AppLovin 的数据非常好。他在那里获得了很好的投资回报。所以,在我看来,AppLovin 确实为企业提供了价值。
I looked at different people who tried to use it. I have, you know, tried watching videos and interviewed a couple of people who have actually used the app , and it seems, well, yes, it is a very good app.
From an advertising perspective, you get very good value for what you spend . And considering the person I spoke to was advertising, he advertises heavily on Google. He advertises on Meta.
He advertises on AppLovin and some other platforms. But in both cases, he said that Ab Lovren's numbers were very good. He was getting a very good return on his investment there.
So, in my opinion, well, Ab Lovne definitely offers value to the business .
我认为这引出了一个更大的问题:市场是否因为一些坏消息,以及毫无疑问因为增长放缓,而出现了超卖?现在,我还要指出,这将是一种有一定周期性的商业活动,因为它会随经济周期波动。如果经济开始受挫,而经济最近已经受了不小的打击,你可能会减少广告支出。
在经济繁荣、利率低、一切都欣欣向荣的时候,那没问题,会有更多人投放广告。这会给这项业务带来压力。因此,这可能使现在成为考虑 AppLovin 这类公司的好时机。
I think this raises a bigger question: Has the market oversold due to some bad news and undoubtedly due to slowing growth? Now, I will also point out that this will be a somewhat cyclical business activity, as it will move with the cycles of the economy.
If the economy starts to suffer , and the economy has suffered a fair amount recently , you may spend less money on advertising. In a booming economy, where interest rates are low and everything is thriving.
Okay, then that's fine, more people will advertise. This will put pressure on this work. Therefore, this might make this a good time to consider a company like Ab Lovne.
不过,当我们接着看流通股时,可以看到他们曾在一段时间内不断增加股份,但此后有所企稳,甚至可能略有下降,这意味着他们回购了一些股份。
However, when we move on to look at the outstanding shares, we can see that they had been increasing their shares for a while, but have since stabilized somewhat , and perhaps even declined slightly, which means they have repurchased some shares.
好,现在我们继续看一些现金流数据,看看这只股票今天可能值多少。首先看经营现金流。我们可以看到,经营现金流和收入一样大幅增长。所以,这也许并不令人意外。再看自由现金流,我们发现自由现金流看起来非常相似。
这家公司的资本支出其实非常小,所以自由现金流往往与经营现金流紧密跟随。
Okay, now let's move on and look at some cash flow figures to see what the stock could be worth today. First, we look at the operating cash flow. We can see that operating cash flow, just like revenues, has increased significantly.
So, perhaps this is not surprising. When we turn to look at free cash flow, we find that free cash flow looks very similar. This company actually has very small capital expenditures, so free cash flow tends to closely track cash flow from operations.
现在,为了使用折现自由现金流,我们可以看看分析师对未来几年的预测。因此,只看分析师对未来三年的预测,有意思的是,用折现自由现金流算下来,这家公司的合理价值约为每股336美元。我们可以在“Investors Group”网站上看到,有不少分析师给出了这些数字中的每一个。
第一年有23位分析师,第二年有19位,第三年有10位。因此,这些数字多少偏保守。我们可以看到他们预期公司持续增长,这里的假设是,如果它增长了这个幅度,之后每年再增长2.5%,那么这只股票的价值可能在336美元左右。
这意味着大约28%的上涨空间,所以看起来相当不错。
Now, in order to use discounted free cash flow, we can look at analysts' estimates for the next few years. Therefore, looking only at analysts’ estimates for the next three years, it is interesting that we end up with a fair value for this company using discounted free cash flow of about $336 per share.
We can see on the "Investors Group" website that we have quite a few analysts who come up with each of these figures. We have 23 analysts in the first year, 19 analysts in the second year, and 10 analysts in the third year.
Therefore, these figures are somewhat conservative . We can see that they expect continued growth, and the assumption here is that if it grows this amount and then grows by 2.5% after that, the stock could be worth around $336.
This means an increase of about 28%, so it looks pretty good .
我很好奇,就开始摆弄这些数字,想看看,如果我们把预期稍微调低一点会怎样?比如,如果我们拿分析师的预测,每年下调15%会怎样?那么现在,这只股票的估值大约就在它的合理价值附近。所以,如果我们认为增长不会达到分析师的预期,或者整体经济可能面临压力之类的。
那么,只要未来三年每年下调15%,那些金黄色的区间就是这些预测。我觉得这有点过于保守了,但如果我们好奇的话,这会让这只股票现在看起来估值合理。因此,我们可以看到,如果那些金色柱子得以实现,我们得到的隐含回报率大约是9%,但如果只看绿色柱子,隐含回报率接近11%。
I was curious and started playing with the numbers and wanted to see, what if we lowered the expectations a little? What if we took the analysts' estimates and reduced them by 15% each year, for example?
Well, now the stock will be valued at approximately its fair value. So, if we think that growth will not be as expected by analysts, or perhaps there will be pressure on the overall economy or something like that .
Well, just a 15% decrease in each of the next three years, the gold-yellow bands would be those estimates. I think it's a bit too conservative , but if we're curious, it makes the stock feel fairly valued right now .
Therefore, we can see that if those golden bars are realized , we will get an implied return of approximately 9%, but if we go back to the green bar only, the implied return is close to 11%.
好,我们来看看“Investors Grow”里的价值区间图,回顾一下。这些价值区域,同样,是我们衡量如果你在绿色区域买入这只股票会怎样?如果我在红色区域买入会怎样?那么,如果我在绿色区域买入,我会获得超过300%的利润。
如果你在红色区域买入,你仍然会盈利。我会获得大约20%的利润,但不如在折价时买入那么多。无论如何,这证实了折价买入股票是有道理的,而且根据远期市盈率,这只股票目前似乎处于折价状态。
Okay, let's review this by looking at the value zones chart in "Investors Grow". So, these valuable areas, again, are where we measure what if you had bought the stock when it was in the green zone?
What if I bought it when it was in the red zone? Well, if I had bought it when it was green, I would have made a profit of over 300%. If you had bought it when it was red, you would still have made a profit.
I would have made a profit of approximately 20%, but not as much if I had bought it at a discounted price. In any case, this confirms that buying shares at a discount makes sense , and according to the forward price-to-earnings ratio, the stock appears to be discounted at the moment .
因此,我认为这是一家值得考虑加入我们投资组合的有趣公司。至于我,我会把这家公司放进我的观察名单。我犹豫要不要把它加入我的个人投资组合,原因很简单,坦白说,我已经暴露在广告行业的风险之中了。
我的投资组合里持有Google的股票。我的投资组合里持有Meta的股票。我有很多这类相似的股票。我认为这是一家很棒的公司,我相信它在未来十年会有不错的表现。它目前的价格是合理的。
我想看看接下来会发生什么。这只股票会继续下跌吗?这就是我要把它放进观察名单的原因。至于我自己的钱包,我目前犹豫它是否适合。
Therefore, I think it is an interesting company to consider adding to our investment portfolio. As for me, I will put this company on my watch list . I hesitate to add it to my personal portfolio simply because, frankly, I am already exposed to the risks of the advertising world.
I own Google shares in my portfolio. I own Meta shares in my portfolio. I have many similar stocks of this type. I think it's a great company, and I believe it will perform well over the next decade.
It is currently available at a reasonable price. I want to see what happens next. Will the stock continue to decline? That's why I'm going to put him on the watch list. As for my own wallet, I am hesitant about how suitable it is for it at the moment .