说话者看好 CRWV,因为其 AI 基础设施扩建已得到验证,能让 GPU 持续为 AI 实验室运行,并且属于最优秀之列;与 AI 实验室的长期合同回款周期更长,但更有保障,其较新的企业业务重心带来更高利润率,且已宣布 1.5 吉瓦的活跃电力。未来的债务融资是关键不确定性;若情况明朗,将降低市场波动。
逐段跳播
SpaceX 是否已经变得如此之大,以至于它可能会抢占一部分新兴云公司或规模较小的 AI 玩家(例如 Nebius、Korwef、Iron、Cipher 等)的份额?
Has SpaceX become so big that it might capture a share of emerging cloud companies or smaller AI players such as Nebius, Korwef, Iron, Cipher, etc.?
对我来说,SpaceX 在这件事上的表态,比 Korwef 或任何其他实体说同样的话要有分量得多。他们拥有与 Korwef 和 OpenAI,或 Nebius 和 Anthropic 同样全面的愿景。
For me, SpaceX’s statement on this matter carries much more weight than if Korwef or any other entity had said it They possess the same comprehensive vision as Korwef and OpenAI or Nebius and Anthropic.
好。现在,我要谈谈我的股票,不幸的是,正是这只股票引发了所有这些戏剧性事件。所以,这只股票将是 Coreweave。让我分享一些我现在看好 Coreweave 的理由。和那个用途非常相似,不是吗?
他们在半导体分析中处于白金级别。并不是我想把它视为黄金标准,但至少它告诉我们:“嘿,这是一个非常好的平台。”这是其中之一……他们与大量 AI 实验室和 AI 玩家合作过。他们给了我所有证据,证明他们能够建设基础设施,能够及时建成,最重要的是,他们能够让那些算力和收入运转起来。
因为最大的问题之一不仅仅是让数据中心启动并运行,而是你能让那些图形处理器(GPU)非常快速地持续运行吗?Coreweave 可能做得好的一件事,就是最擅长让那些 GPU 为 AI 实验室运行得非常好。
现在,他们确实更专注于长期合同和 AI 实验室,这往往有更长的回本周期,只是因为那些合同稍长一些,而且背后有更多保障。但最近他们开始更多地关注 Nebius 所做的,更多地关注企业领域,那里没有像 SpaceX 那样的非常短的合同,但也不像 AI 实验室那样长达数年。
这些往往有略高的利润率,所以我喜欢这一点,尤其是因为他们有大量活跃的能源。他们最近宣布了 1.5 吉瓦的活跃电力,我原以为这很多,但后来 SpaceX 出现了,不是吗?然后 SpaceX 出现了,向我表明这并没有那么疯狂。
所以,我回到正题,差不多就是这样。他们在建设 AI 基础设施方面做得非常好。我认为这种失衡将继续存在。我认为他们很好地证明了他们是最优秀的之一。
Good. Now, I'll move on to my stock, and unfortunately, it's the stock that caused all that drama. So, this stock will be Coreweave. Um, let me share some of my reasons for being optimistic about Coreweave right now .
Very similar to that use, isn't it? They are at the platinum level for semiconductor analysis. It's not that I want to consider it a gold standard, but at least it tells us: "Hey, this is a really good platform."
This is one of...they have worked with huge amounts of AI labs and AI players. They gave me all the evidence that they could build the infrastructure, that they could build it in a timely manner, and most importantly, that they could make that computing and revenue work.
Because one of the biggest problems is not just getting the data center up and running , but can you keep those graphics processing units (GPUs) running very fast? One thing Coreweave probably does is be the best at keeping those GPUs running very well for AI labs .
Now, they are really focusing more on long- term contracts and AI labs, and that tends to have a longer payback period just because those contracts are a little longer, and you have more security behind them.
Um, but recently they have started to focus more on what Nebius does, focusing more on the enterprise space where there are no very short contracts as with SpaceX, but not as long as for several years as with AI labs.
These tend to have a slightly higher profit margin, so I like that, especially since they have a lot of active energy. They recently announced 1.5 gigawatts of active power which I thought was a lot, but then SpaceX came along , didn't they?
Then SpaceX came along and showed me that it wasn't all that crazy . Um, so, I'll go back , so it's pretty much about that. They have done a really good job in building an AI infrastructure.
I think this will continue to be an imbalance. I think they did a good job of proving that they are among the best.
回到我刚才向你提的问题,如果有一件事我真的很想弄清楚,我觉得会是和未来融资相关的。和 Neo 类似,不是吗?但现在对 Coreweave 来说更重要的是,不是吗?大家都担心你未来是否要偿还这些巨额债务。
这背后的策略是什么?我们知道 Nvidia 最近开始与金融界许多银行体系合作来帮助解决这类问题,对吧?这些都是与高利率之类相关的问题。你能不能解释一下,为什么市场在某种程度上是错的,或者不幸地是对的?
请就你们未来的债务状况和整体情况给我一个直截了当的回答。对我来说,这会是一个确定的答案,因为我认为市场始终关注的事情之一就是风险和不确定性。目前,对于正在发生什么存在一种不确定的状态。
如果你能就这种模糊之处给我们一些明确的信息,我相信市场的波动会小一些。所以是的,那会是我的选择,Neo,我希望我们能从 Coreweave 那里得到一些明确的说法。
Returning to the question I posed to you, if there is one thing I would really like to clarify, um, I think it would be related to future financing. Similar to Neo, isn't that right?
But what's more important now, for Coreweave, isn't it? You have all this fear of whether you will have to pay these huge sums for future debts. What is the strategy behind this?
We know that Nvidia has recently started partnering with many financial banking systems in the financial world to help with such problems, right? These are the kinds of issues related to high interest rates and the like.
Can you explain why the market is somewhat wrong or unfortunately right? Give me a straightforward answer about your future debt situation and what things look like. For me, this would be a definitive answer because one of the things I think the market always looks at is risk and uncertainty.
Currently, there is a state of uncertainty about what is happening. If you provide us with some clarity regarding this ambiguity, I believe the market will be less volatile. So yes, that would be my choice, Neo, and I hope we get some clarity from Coreweave.
这个频道对 $CRWV 的历次判断
The Motley Fool 在这只股票上共 2 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。