继续前请同意我们的使用条款、隐私说明及 YouTube 服务条款。

$GOOGL

$GOOGL · The Motley Fool · 2026-10-29

AI 摘要 · The Motley Fool

Alphabet这个季度是昂贵而非糟糕:营收增长25%,营业利润增长30%,但超过510亿美元的资本开支翻了一倍多,自由现金流为负90亿美元,而此前为正250亿美元,明年资本开支可能从2000亿美元升至3000亿美元。数字可能太大,难以让投资者相信这些支出值得,不过数据中心的回报本就滞后;三年间营收增长53%,经营现金流增长76%,Cloud增长103%,而Azure为48%,RPO为5680亿美元、环比增加480亿美元,而微软为6830亿美元、环比减少10亿美元,广告业务也并未被放弃。

他说的是几年内
《Alphabet Almost Sets a Record No One Wants》
The Motley Fool发布 2026-10-29 · 18 段内容
00:02/ —打开原视频

逐段跳播

18 段内容
0:027:02

Alphabet 差点创下一项没人真正想要的纪录。今早微软和谷歌都发布了财报,情况还挺劲爆的。正如我们所说,这项没人想要的纪录截至目前是:Alphabet 市值已蒸发约5000亿美元。就在我们录制时,股价下跌了约12%。

Alphabet almost sets a record no one really wants. We have both Microsoft and Google reporting this morning and it was a bit of a doozy. As we said, the the record no one wants is as of right now, Alphabets has lost about $500 billion in market cap. Shares are down about 12% as we're recording.

所以,市场似乎不喜欢谷歌所说的话,或者说谷歌,Alphabet 所呈现出的情况。大家都在往谷歌身上堆的那个大叙事到底是什么?你认同这个叙事吗?

So, the market doesn't seem to like what Google is saying or uh the apparent of Google, Alphabet. What is the big narrative here that everyone seems to be piling onto Google? And do you buy that narrative?

首先,Alphabet 或者说谷歌,我可能还是习惯叫它谷歌,这个季度并不差。它只是过了一个很烧钱的季度。这才是真正的叙事所在。

Well, I mean, the first thing is Alphabet or Google, I'm I might still call them Google, didn't have a bad quarter. It it had an expensive quarter. And that's really the narrative here.

对于这样规模的公司来说,营收增长看起来很棒。营收增长了25%,营业利润增长了30%。对于这样一家规模庞大、说实话相当成熟的企业来说,这些都是巨大的数字。

I mean, revenue growth looked great for a company of this size. Revenue grew 25%. Operating income was up 30%. Those are huge numbers for such a large and honestly quite a mature business.

真正的问题在于现金。这个季度他们的资本支出超过510亿美元,是去年同期的两倍多;而自由现金流为负90亿美元,去年同期则是接近250亿美元的正自由现金流。

Uh the real problem is cash. Um for for this quarter, uh their capex was over $51 billion. That's more than double a year ago and free cash flow is negative $9 billion compared to almost 25 billion in positive free cash flow the same quarter last year.

不仅如此,他们还预计资本支出将从今年的约2000亿美元升至明年的3000亿美元。我之前就说过,总有一天这些数字会大到让投资者无法相信这笔支出是值得的。我认为我们可能已经到了那个节点。

And not only that, they're expecting capex to rise from about 200 billion this year to 300 billion next year. Now, I've said before that at some point the numbers are going to get too big to convince investors that this spending is going to be worth it. And I think we might be at that point.

谷歌云的营收增速已经连续六个季度加快,现在超过100%。但如果公司在利润层面不赚钱,或者不能产生正的自由现金流,市场就不相信这笔投入是值得的。

I mean, Google Cloud's revenue growth, their growth rate has accelerated for six consecutive quarters and is now over 100%. But if the company's not making money on the bottom line or or generating positive free cash flow, the market's not convinced it's going to be worth it.

John,你和我其实在节目开始前就聊过这个,因为要赚钱就得先花钱,而对于超大规模云厂商来说,所有这些数据中心都会带来拖累,你得先把钱花在这些数据中心上,它们才能上线。

Yeah, John, you and I, we were actually talking about this before the show a little bit because, you know, got to spend money to make money and and with hyperscalers, all of these data centers, there's going to be a drag here like you have to spend all this money for these data centers before they come online.

所以我们看到,也许回报率在下降,资本在大规模流出,但你当时的论点是:没错,可一旦这些东西开始上线,我们就应该看到回报开始回升。在看到最近这份财报之后,你还相信这一点吗?

so we're seeing this, you know, maybe this decline in returns, this big outflow of capital, but the argument you were making is like, well, yeah, but once those things start to come online, we should start to see the return start to bounce back.

Do you still believe that after you're seeing this most recent earnings?

投资和投资回报之间自然会有滞后。在像这样往一个数据中心投入这么多钱的情况下,回报不可能瞬间出现。那个数据中心要过一段时间才会开始为你产生回报。你得先花钱,想想光是浇筑混凝土,之后才能真正产出算力和收入。所以自然会有滞后。

There's naturally going to be a lag in between the investment and the return on the investment. That can't happen instantaneously in cases like this where you're spending so much money into a data center.

That data center is not going to start to generate a return for you until sometime later. You're going to be spending money. Think about just pouring concrete before you're actually generating some compute and revenue from that. So naturally, there's going to be a lag.

看看过去三年。正如 Matt 指出的,对于这样规模的公司来说,这是惊人的营收增长。过去三年,滚动12个月营收增长了53%。但如果你看经营现金流,同期增长了76%。所以,这家公司每单位营收产生的现金比三年前更多了,对吧?

Look over the last three years here. As Matt pointed out, this isn't this is incredible revenue growth for a company of this scale. Over the last 3 years, trailing 12-month revenue up 53%.

But if you look at the cash from operations, that's up 76% over the same time. So, the business is generating more cash per revenue than it was three years ago, right?

谷歌有自己的计算硬件,叫 TPU,即张量处理单元。这在一定程度上与 Nvidia 的 GPU 形成竞争。目前那里出现了库存积压,因为他们在为服务客户已经承诺的支出做准备。

Google has its own compute hardware called TPUs, tensor processing units. This is in competition somewhat to Nvidia's GPUs. Right now, there's an inventory buildup there because they're preparing to service commitments that customers have already made to spend.

在离开谷歌这个话题之前,各位,我们看到广告营收出现了一些下滑,因为更多人在使用 AI。你认为这是一个“破釜沉舟”的时刻,也就是要大幅、大幅地把重心转向 AI,还是说我们也许应该继续把广告营收看作会长期存在的东西?

before we get uh move off of Google, guys, we saw some revenue declines at the ad revenue uh because more people are using AI. Is this do you think a burn the ship sort of moment where it's like focus way way more on AI or you know, should we maybe just continue to think of ad revenue? It's going to be there for a while.

不,在我看来这不是要放弃广告业务。特别是因为你们还有 YouTube。这是一个超级、超级大的广告收入来源。而且正如公司所指出的,它在客厅里仍然算是王者,因为我家人就在智能电视上看它。

我们不太会流媒体播放那么多内容,但我们确实大量看 YouTube,而这是一个非常、非常重要的广告收入驱动力。至于搜索,也许它确实开始下滑,但对我来说,那只是小问题,仍然有很多钱可赚。

No, this isn't a pivot away from advertising in my view. I specifically because you do have YouTube still. This is a mega mega advertising revenue generator. And as the company's pointing out, this is still kind of the king, if you will, of the living room because that's what my family is watching on our smart TV.

We tend to not stream so much content, but we do do a lot of YouTube and that's a major major ad revenue driver. And when it comes to search, maybe it is starting to decline, but to me, that's little focus and a lot of money still to be made.

我也说不。我们看到很多其他公司发布财报,它们在用 AI 让广告变得更好方面做得非常出色,我认为这仍然是谷歌的长期目标。

I'd also say no. I mean, a lot of other companies we've seen report um you know, have done a great job of making ad ads better with AI and uh I I think that's still Google's long-term goal.

Google Cloud,我提到过它的增长率,它的增速实际上比 Azure 快得多,103% 对 48%。

Uh Google Cloud, I mentioned their growth rate, it actually grew a whole lot faster than Azure, 103% versus 48%.

这两家公司的剩余履约义务规模极其庞大,它们公布的数字我们甚至难以理解。所以,是的,这些公司未来可能还有大量支出要发生,因为来自客户的未来需求非常大,而 RPO 衡量的正是这一点。

The remaining performance obligations for both companies is incredibly massive. We can't even comprehend the numbers that they're putting out. So, there is potentially, yes, a lot of spending still to happen with these companies because of how much demand from their customers, future demand, and that's what RPO is measuring.

微软的剩余履约义务为 6830 亿美元,规模庞大,但环比实际上下降了 10 亿美元;相比之下,Google,或者说 Alphabet,剩余履约义务为 5680 亿美元,仅比上一季度就增加了 480 亿美元。

所以,Alphabet 的剩余履约义务增长非常、非常持续且庞大,尤其是相比微软。

Microsoft's remaining performance obligations 683 billion massive but actually down 1 billion sequentially compare that to Google or excuse me Alphabet 568 billion in remaining performance obligations that is up 48 billion just from last quarter so massive massive ongoing report uh performance obligation growth for Alphabet compared to Microsoft especially

这个频道对 $GOOGL 的历次判断

The Motley Fool 在这只股票上共 16 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。

跨洋听风