$GOOGL · Tom Nash · 2026-10-29
说话者认为 Google 下跌 10% 是类似 Palantir 的看涨布局。自由现金流为负和资本开支上升是长期云投资;不投入才是更大的风险。云业务增长 103%,订单储备达 6000 亿,云业务占整体业务的 24%,去年为 15%;营收低于预期 0.3% 以及 YouTube/搜索放缓影响较小。
逐段跳播
Google 的股价下跌了10%。
Google's share price dropped by 10%.
因为我今天想谈的第三家公司,也是昨天受损的第三家公司,就是 Google,它在我名单上。它是排名前五的股票之一。这是一种新的 Palantir 模式。所以,Google,再次把 Google 说成 Palantir 模式确实很奇怪,但看看现在的 Google。
如果你看 Google,你会发现它一夜之间跌了10%。好,为什么?好,我们现在看到的是0.6的市盈增长率(PEG)和19倍的前瞻市盈率。一只去年只涨了6%的股票?只有 S&P 500 指数表现的一半?
只有 S&P 500 指数表现的一半?营收增长25%。云业务增长103%,是地球上增长最快的云。营业利润增长30%,营业利润率32%。相对于债务流动性偏弱,市销率八倍,你可以买这家公司。
那它为什么在下跌?哦,因为他们花了很多钱,Tom。看看他们的负自由现金流。看看他们为了建这些云数据中心花了多少钱。我的朋友,我们在这里是认真的吗?我们真的要说 Google 是一家坏公司,因为它把钱花在资本开支上,去争夺全球最大行业里的市场份额,而这个行业已经为 Google 带来了大量收入,并且正以103%的速度增长?
我们真的认真到突然认定花钱就是坏事,不管目的是什么?我认为,如果你是一家巨型云计算公司,不在资本开支上花钱的风险,远远大于一些现在被吓坏的愚蠢投资者所带来的烦恼。现在,如果我把这里的数字给你看,就会一清二楚。
好,Google 的营收低于预期。我们来分析一下,好吗?127.58 对 127.97。哦,我的天。差了0.3%。你是认真的吗,兄弟?好,资本开支翻倍了,Tom。这很糟。我们从240亿变成了510亿。
这糟吗?我们实际上是在进行史上最大的一笔收购中买地,而且他们买的不是未来的想法,它已经在产生大量收入。但 Tom,自由现金流是负的。当然,因为你在增加资本开支。你不懂数学吗?是的,他们因为资本开支有100亿美元的缺口,但这是长期博弈的一部分,不是短期博弈。
如果 Google 当时试图取悦交易员,并在不这样做的情况下实现正自由现金流,他们长期会输。我完全理解他们在做什么。他们就是在说:“看,去你的,还有你那短视的心态。”我们在追求终极目标,如果这让你不舒服,那就这样吧。
那就这样吧。但我想给你看另一些东西。如果你看这个,YouTube 和搜索增长不够快。只有9%和12%。广告收入没有达到预期。我们收到的是820亿,而不是830亿。哦,我的天,别跟我说这些。
谁在乎这个?谁在乎这个?真正的投资者不在乎 YouTube 和 Google 搜索,恕我直言。看看真正的投资者,以及他们实际在看什么。第三季度云计算服务增长了103%。它目前每年产生300亿。
云计算营业利润增长了209%。云计算的营业利润率现在是36%。而且 Google 坐拥一大堆积压订单。他们确实需要建设产能来服务这些5600亿的积压订单。所以,每年300亿,还有6000亿的积压订单需要满足,需要注入资本开支。
好吗?云计算现在占 Google 总业务的24%。这看起来可能不算主导,但就在去年这个数字还是15%,到明年我们谈话的时候,它会高得多。云计算是基础。Google 是垂直整合的,它的张量处理单元(TPU)是自切片面包发明以来最伟大的创新。
Google 是全球增长最快、垂直整合程度最高的云计算提供商,年增长率103%。你会说问题在于这正是让你不舒服的地方吗?
because the third company I want to talk about today and the third company that was hurt yesterday is Google, and it is on my list. It is one of the top five stocks. This is a new Palantir pattern.
So, Google, and it's strange to talk about Google as a Palantir model again, but look at Google now. If you look at Google, you'll find that it dropped by 10% overnight. Okay, why?
Okay, so we're now looking at a price-to-growth ratio of 0.6 and a forward P/E ratio of 19. A stock that only made 6% last year? Half the performance of the S&P 500 index? Half the performance of the S&P 500 index?
Revenue growth of 25%. The cloud is growing at 103%, making it the fastest growing cloud on the planet. Operating income increased by 30% and the operating margin by 32%. With weak liquidity compared to debt and eight times sales, you could buy this company.
So why is it in decline? Oh, because they spend a lot of money, Tom. Look at their negative free cash flows. Look at the amount of money they are spending to build these cloud data centers.
My friend, are we serious here? Are we really saying that Google is a bad company because it spends money on capital expenditures to gain market share in the world's largest industry, an industry that already generates a lot of money for Google and is growing at 103%?
Are we really serious that we've suddenly decided that spending money is bad, regardless of the purpose? I contend that the risks of not spending on capital expenditures, if you are a giant cloud computing company, are far greater than the annoyance of some stupid investors who are scared right now.
Now, if I show you the numbers here, it will be perfectly clear. Well, Google's revenue came in lower than expected. Let's analyze it, okay? 127.58 versus 127.97. Oh, my God. A deficit of 0.3%.
Are you serious, brother? Well, capital expenditures have doubled, Tom. This is bad . We went from 24 billion to 51 billion. Is this bad? We are literally buying land in the largest acquisition in history, and it's not that they are buying future ideas, it's already generating tons of money.
But Tom, free cash flow is negative. Of course it is because you are increasing capital expenditures. Don't you know mathematics? Yes, they have a $10 billion deficit due to capital expenditures, but that's part of the long game , not the short game.
If Google had been trying to please traders and had achieved positive free cash flow without doing so, they would have lost in the long run. I fully understand what they are doing .
They are simply saying, "Look, screw you and your short- sighted mentality." We are pursuing the ultimate goal, and if that bothers you, so be it . So be it. But I want to show you something else .
If you look at this, you know, YouTube and search aren't growing fast enough . Only 9% and 12%. Advertising revenue did not meet expectations. We received 82 billion instead of 83 billion.
Oh my God, spare me this talk . Who cares about this? Who cares about this? Real investors do n't care about YouTube and Google search, with all due respect. Look at real investors , and what they are actually looking at.
Cloud computing services in the third quarter rose by 103%. It currently generates 30 billion annually. Cloud computing operating profits rose by 209%. The operating profit margin for cloud computing is now 36%.
And Google is sitting on a pile of backlogged requests. They literally need to build capacity to serve these backlogged orders of 560 billion. So, 30 billion annually, and there are 600 billion in backlogged requests that need to be met, and capital expenditures need to be injected .
Good? Cloud computing now accounts for 24% of Google's total business. This may not seem like a dominance, but just last year the figure was 15%, and by the time we speak next year, it will be much higher.
Cloud computing is the foundation. Google is vertically integrated , and its Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) are the greatest innovation since sliced bread was invented . Google is the fastest growing, and most vertically integrated cloud computing provider in the world, with an annual growth rate of 103%.
Would you say that the problem is that this is what bothers you?
就像 Google 用张量处理单元(TPU)所做的那样。
just like Google does with Tensor Processing Units ( TPUs).
也就是 Nvidia 和 Google,它是全球垂直整合程度最高、增长最快的云服务提供商。不是 Bloom,但 Amazon 很庞大,Google 也很庞大,不过这并不重要。
namely Nvidia and Google, which is the world’s most vertically integrated and fastest-growing cloud provider . It's not Bloom, but Amazon is huge , and Google is huge, but that does n't matter.
到了某个时候,下一个 Palantir 就是 Palantir、Bloom、Amazon、Google 等等本身。
At some point, the next Palantir is just Palantir, Bloom , Amazon, Google, and so on.