继续前请同意我们的使用条款、隐私说明及 YouTube 服务条款。

$GOOGL

$GOOGL · The Motley Fool · 2026-11-06

AI 摘要 · The Motley Fool

说话者认为Alphabet的核心搜索业务面临严峻挑战:如今多数搜索以更难变现的AI摘要收尾,搜索贡献了绝大部分营业利润,下游客户受损应会向上游传导压力;大模型让广告整合更难,并可能把较小的广告主挤出。他给Alphabet以善意假设,认为它或许能适应并继续产生现金,结果可能还不错,但表示旧搜索模式不会被复制,不确定性很高,投资者有理由为Alphabet股票权衡这一点。

看跌他说的是几年内
《Nasdaq In Freefall: Is the AI Trade Ending?》
The Motley Fool发布 2026-11-06 · 4 段内容
11:04/ —打开原视频

逐段跳播

4 段内容

我们在 Alphabet 身上经历过这个。那不过是18个月前的事,对吧?搜索已死。结果搜索并没有死。也许它实际上还是上个季度的增长来源。

We went through this with Alphabet. Uh it was only what 18 months ago, right? Search is dead. C turns out search wasn't dead. Maybe it's the growth actually for this past quarter.

我们确定搜索,特别是 Google 搜索,陷入困境了吗?我确定 Google 搜索陷入了困境。市场以及很多其他非常聪明的人可能不同意我的看法,但我这么说的原因是,我们已经看到 Google 搜索的下游客户在 Google 搜索上的获客方式发生了根本性变化。

他们上个季度谈到了这一点。这些搜索中的大多数现在都以他们的 AI 摘要结束。在我看来,Alphabet 要弄清楚如何将这些变现要难得多。Alphabet 的业务是多元化的,但他们运营利润的大部分,绝大部分仍然来自 Google 搜索。

所以我认为,对 Alphabet、对 Google 搜索以及整个搜索行业来说,在 LLM 的世界里如何变现,存在一个很大的问号。而如果你的下游客户受到如此严重的伤害,那么这传导到上游只是时间问题。

Are we sure that search, Google search specifically, is in trouble? I am sure Google search is in trouble. the market and lots of other very smart people may disagree with me here, but the reason I say that is because we have seen a fundamental change in the way that acquisitions are happening for Google's downstream customers on Google search.

They talked about it last quarter. A majority of these searches are now ending with their AI summaries. Those are much harder in my opinion for Alphabet to figure out how to monetize.

Alphabet has a diversified business, but the majority of their operating profit, the vast majority of it still comes from Google search. So I think there is a big question mark for Alphabet, for Google search and search in general about how we monetize that in the world of LLMs.

And if your downstream customers are being hurt that badly, then only a matter of time before that flows upstream.

他们一直没能很好地将其变现。我并不一定认为他们就想不出办法,或者无法演进,它仍然会是他们的一大堆现金。即使那是另一种形式的现金,我也愿意给他们一些信任,相信他们能想明白。但我们五年前所熟知的搜索正陷入严重困境,明天会是什么样并没有确定性。

我认为,投资者在考虑 Alphabet 股票时,有理由权衡这一点。尽管我确实有点认为对他们来说一切最终都会好起来。

they haven't been able to monetize it as well. I don't necessarily assume there that they won't figure it out or they won't be able to evolve and it's still going to be a massive pile of cash for them.

Even if it's a different kind of cash, I give them some benefit of the doubt to figure that out. But search as we knew it 5 years ago is in serious trouble and there isn't the certainty of what tomorrow looks like.

And I think that is I I I think investors are right to weigh on the kind of to weigh that when they consider Alphabet shares. even if I do kind of think it'll all turn out okay for them.

不是。我这么说的原因是,每次你点击 Google 上的那个链接,Google 都会因此获得收入。而且你知道吗?他们可以在 Google 搜索结果顶部放任意多的赞助链接,而你会一直往下滑,直到找到你想要的那个。

你点击它,Google 就获得收入。在我看来,到目前为止我们看到的是,大型语言模型要把广告整合进它们的回答要难得多,至少很难达到过去的同等比例,尤其是在广告数量方面。而且我实际上认为,投放在 Google 平台上的广告大部分来自中小型企业,它们负担不起。

如果我们要用更少的广告换取更高的价格——我认为这是很多大型语言模型提供商的一个论点——那你就会把很多人挤出市场。他们会去哪里?他们会去 Meta。他们会去 YouTube,而 YouTube 又归 Alphabet 所有,这很好,但他们会去更容易获得点击的短视频内容,而不是大型语言模型里的一个答案。

所以,是的,我不是说 Google 想不出办法。他们肯定在努力,但我不认为那能复制 Google 搜索在过去20年里所拥有的那种了不起的商业模式。我认为这对他们来说是一个非常大的挑战。

Nope. And the reason I say that is because every time you clicked on that link from Google, Google got paid for that. And you know what? They could put as many sponsored links as they wanted at the top of that Google search and you'd scroll until you got the one you wanted.

You click on it, Google got paid. It's much, in my opinion, so far we have seen it is much harder for a large language models to integrate ads into their answers, at least at the same rates that they have been in the past, especially when it refers to the quantity of ads.

And I actually think that a majority of the ads being placed on Google's platforms again coming from small to medium businesses can't afford. If we're going to have less ads for more expensive prices, which I think is a thesis for a lot of these large language model providers, you're pricing a lot of people out the market.

Where are they going? Well, they're going to Meta. They're going to um YouTube, which again did owned by Alphabet, which is great, but they're going to short form content that is more likely to get them clickthrough as opposed to one answer in a large language model.

So, yeah, I'm not saying that Google can't figure it out. They're certainly trying to, but I do not think that that's going to replicate the incredible business model that Google search has had up over the course of the past 20 years. I think that is a very big challenge for them.

这个频道对 $GOOGL 的历次判断

The Motley Fool 在这只股票上共 16 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。

跨洋听风