HIMS 属于高风险投机性买入标的,巨大的潜在市场规模与超过 50% 的增长潜力,与激烈竞争、监管不确定性及利润率承压风险相互抵消。
逐段跳播
Hims & Hers 是市场上讨论度最高的股票之一,同时也是波动性最大的股票之一。过去五年该股上涨了 250%,但如果看过去一年,该股下跌了约 50%。公司内部正在发生很多事情。
Hims & Hers is one of the most talked-about stocks in the market. It is also one of the most volatile stocks . The stock has risen by 250% over the past five years , but if you look at it over the past year, the stock has fallen by about 50%. There's a lot going on inside the company.
我们将以这样一个问题来结束讨论:这只股票今天是买入还是卖出?不,我是想相信这只股票的,但好吧。我们先从这家公司做什么说起。这在一定程度上属于我们所说的远程医疗。它与我们过去看到的一些较早期的远程医疗公司有些不同,但核心是通过一个应用来实现;有 Hims 应用和 Hers 应用。
你可以访问它们,然后它们有可以进入的专科领域。比如减重在过去 18 到 24 个月里受到了很多关注。但也有睾酮,还有勃起功能障碍,这其实是他们起步时的业务。他们在这个领域做过一次挺有意思的病毒式营销活动。
还有脱发。因此,他们现在拥有并不断增加的是一系列不同的专科领域。
We will conclude our discussion with the question: Is this stock to buy or sell today? No, I want to believe in this stock, but okay. Let's start with what the company does. So, this falls somewhat under what we call telehealth.
It's a bit different from what we've seen in the past with some of the older telehealth companies , but it's about having an app; there's the Hims app and the Hers app. You can access them and then they have specializations that can be accessed.
So, things like weight loss have received a lot of attention over the past 18 to 24 months. But there's also testosterone, you know, erectile dysfunction is something they've actually started with.
A type of interesting viral campaign that they ran in this field . Hair loss. Therefore, there is now a range of different specializations that they not only possess, but also add.
我认为这里的想法是,他们试图在医疗健康领域搭建一个平台。因此,他们最近采取的许多举措,比如加入人工智能和实验室。这是我自己亲身体验过的,所以我获得了更多关于自己健康的信息。然后这些信息以一种比传统方式更容易获取的方式回到你手中——传统方式是去看医生、做检查,可能还要为此支付巨额费用。这是一个非常简便的流程。
I think the idea here is that they are trying to build a platform in the healthcare field . Therefore, many of the moves they have made recently , such as adding artificial intelligence and laboratories .
This is something I experienced myself, so I gained much more information about my health. Then it comes back to you in a way that is more easily accessible than the traditional way of going to the doctor and having tests done, and perhaps having to pay huge sums of money for that. It's a very easy process.
但是,当你审视 Hims&Hers 时,这是对企业进行分类的一种合理方式吗?它对未来抱有什么样的愿景?他们想成为你遇到健康问题时第一个去的地方吗?也许他们今天还不是这样,但这正是他们在慢慢构建的。
But, when you look at Hims&Hers, is this a fair way to categorize businesses and what kind of vision is it for the future? Do they want to be the first place you go to for healthcare questions?
Perhaps this is not what they are today, but this is what they are slowly building.
我认为是这样。我认为他们就是这样看待自己的。说实话,医疗体系是有缺陷的,需要修复,而他们提出了一个他们设想的未来模式。是的,我认为他们把自己描述为多学科的,所以他们不会满足于只做一件事,而且正如我提到的,他们涉足许多领域。
他们常常在目前能够获益的领域开展业务。你知道,那些最具争议的问题,在我看来这很合乎逻辑。我完全不是在批评这一点。这是他们必须做的。但没错,他们想陪伴在你身边,从虚拟问诊和诊断,到针对各种问题的处方。
我认为他们希望看到这一点随着时间推移不断增长。我认为他们正朝着我们在另一边看到的那种私立医疗演进,也就是医生逐渐脱离保险体系。我们正走向这样一个灰色地带:私立医疗在体系之外扩张,并且越来越多地转向线上。
我认为他们希望成为先行者,成为那个宏大的平台,一旦我们进入这个新世界。
I think so. I think this is how they see themselves. Let's be honest, the health system is flawed and needs fixing, and they are putting forward a model they envision for the future .
Yes, I think they described themselves as multidisciplinary, so they wouldn't be satisfied with just one thing, and as I mentioned, they are present in many fields. They often work in areas where they can currently benefit.
You know, the most controversial issues, which seems logical to me. I don't mean that as criticism at all. This is what they must do . But yes, they want to be by your side, from virtual consultations and diagnoses to prescriptions for a variety of issues.
I think they would like to see that grow over time. I think they are evolving towards that kind of private medical care that we see on the other side, where doctors are moving away from the insurance system.
We are heading towards this gray area where private medical care is expanding outside the system, and growing more and more online. I think they hope to be the initiators, the grand platform, once we arrive in this new world .
是的,我只想强调你说的一点,就是“在传统生态系统之外”。Hims & Hers 目前没有做的一件事就是接受保险,我认为这是管理层一个非常重要的决定。因为管理层过去明确说过——几乎每次财报电话会议他们都会被问到:“你们什么时候开始接受保险?”
——而且他们的一些竞争对手,比如 Rowe,已经接受保险了。但他们说的是,我们无法在身处现状之中的同时改变现状。所以我认为这是一个有意思的局面,如果你看看过去两年 GLP-1 药物发生的情况,他们已经开始引入这些药物。
我们应该稍微谈谈这件事。但他们已经开始提供 GLP-1 药物了。他们有药物配制设施,是自己拥有的 503A 和 503B 设施。他们生产了这些减重方案。Semaglutide,我认为那是最引人注目的。
但那是根据美国食品药品监督管理局的一项豁免来做的。当那项豁免结束时,他们已经把预期推到了极限。当时的想法是:“嘿,我们可以以低得多的价格提供这个。”这应该成为 FDA 考量的一部分。
我不认为他们真的赢得了那场战争。但最终,我们看到 GLP-1 药物的成本从每月数千美元降到了大约那个数额的十分之一。所以这里的激励似乎是让 Hims&Hers 为市场带来一些价格透明度。
我相信,在传统保险体系的范围之外这样做,可能会带来重大改变。
Yes, I just want to highlight something you said, which is "outside the traditional ecosystem". One of the things that Hems & Hers does not currently do is accept insurance, and I think that is a very important decision by management.
Because what management has said explicitly in the past—and they receive questions on almost every conference call about: "When will you start accepting insurance?"—and some of their competitors, like Rowe, already accept insurance.
But what they said was that we cannot change the status quo while we live within it. So I think this is an interesting situation, and if you look at what has happened with GLP-1 drugs over the past two years, they have started to introduce them.
We should address this matter a little. But they have already started offering GLP-1 drugs . They have pharmaceutical compounding facilities , 503A and 503B facilities which they own themselves.
They produced these weight loss solutions. Semaglutide , I think it was the most prominent. But that was done under an exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. When that exemption ended, they had pushed the limits of expectations as far as they could.
The idea was: "Hey, we can offer this at a much lower price ." That should be part of the FDA's calculations . I do n't think they really won that war. But in the end, we saw the cost of the GLP-1 drug drop from thousands of dollars a month to about one-tenth of that amount.
So it seems the incentive here is for Hims&Hers to bring some price transparency to the market. I believe that doing so outside the scope of the traditional insurance system could make a significant difference.
由于他们从业务量中获得了一些好处,据他们说,现在已经达到约 290 万订阅用户。平均每位订阅用户的支出仍然只有每月约 92 美元。你知道,这是一笔不小的钱,但这意味着平均每位订阅用户花 20 或 30 美元买一粒治脱发的药,或者一粒治勃起功能障碍的药。
他们不会花 300 美元,而那是减重治疗起步的水平。所以我认为,有很多机会可以给这个平台带来更多解决方案、增加更多订阅用户,而且实际上能以更低的成本做到这一点,因为传统医生、药房和保险体系中存在那些扭曲的激励。
Since they are getting some benefits from the volume of work, they have now reached about 2.9 million subscribers, according to them. The average subscriber's spending is still only about $92 per month.
You know, that's a lot of money, but it means the average subscriber gets, you know , a pill for hair loss or maybe a pill for erectile dysfunction for $20 or $30. They don't spend $300, which is the level at which weight loss treatment begins.
So I think there are a lot of opportunities to bring more solutions to this platform , add more subscribers, and actually do it at a lower cost because of those twisted incentives that exist in the traditional doctor, pharmacy and insurance system.
我认为这是合理的。我的意思是,你看,问题在于这是有极限的。我的意思是,他们越是扩大颠覆这一体系的努力,就必须承担越大的负担,面临越多的复杂情况。因此,我认为他们留在慢性和高度个人化的健康类别中是有利的,因为首先,慢性病意味着经常性收入,其次,对于那些在体系之外寻找替代方案的人来说,存在真实的需求。
如果你只是有,我不知道,高胆固醇,或者腿上的坏疽之类的,那你可能不在他们的目标受众之内。我只是想说,他们能够运作的范围是有极限的,但在这些类别之内——说实话,这些类别非常容易受到网红和第三方营销的影响——这对他们最有利。
再说一次,这没有什么不对,他们依赖这种做法,而且他们确实在这么做。所以,我认为当你考虑尝试扩大这一模式的规模,并思考长期的正向预期时,我不确定它在其他领域会像在他们目前经营的领域那样成功。
I think this is fair. I mean, look, the problem is that there are limits to this . I mean, the more they expand their efforts to disrupt the system, the greater the burdens they will have to bear and the greater the complications they will face.
Therefore, I think it is beneficial for them to stay in the chronic and highly personal health categories, because firstly, it is a chronic condition which means recurring income, and secondly, there is a real need for people who are looking for alternatives outside the system.
If you only have, I do n't know, high cholesterol or gangrene in your leg or something like that, then you're probably not in their target audience. I'm just trying to say that there are limits to the scope in which they can operate, but within these categories which are, let's be honest, very subject to influencers and third-party marketing .
This is in their best interest. Again, there is nothing wrong with that, they rely on this approach, and they are indeed doing it. So, I think when you think about trying to scale up the model and thinking about long-term positive expectations, I'm not sure it will be as successful in other areas as it is in the areas they are working in now.
Hims&Hers 瞄准最赚钱的领域,这一点值得肯定,这也是它应该做的。你认为像医疗领域的人工智能这样的东西,会不会成为一个它们能够大放异彩的领域,并形成一个反馈循环?我的想法是,我正在收集大量关于自己健康的数据。
我一直戴着 Garmin 手表。我有一台 Garmin 体重秤。这些设备不仅收集我的体重信息,还收集我的心率和运动量。我可以很方便地录入与饮食相关的数据。为此有很多有趣的工具。
再加上实验室检测的结果。但这一切将如何处理?我的意思是,去看医生的问题在于,你是在某个特定的时间点去的,对吧?比如,他们给你量血压。这不是你日常的血压,只是你那一刻的血压。因此,他们会基于那一个瞬间为你做出医疗决定或开具治疗方案。
现在我们正进入一个这些数据全天候可获取的世界。所以在我看来,拥有一个能帮助你持续、更主动地过上更健康生活的平台,可能是一件积极的事。我们谈到的一些 Hims&Hers 正在推向市场的东西,比如肽类,在过去一年左右受到了最多的关注。
这种更主动的解决方案,比如进行实验室检测,会是一种更主动的方式。他们还通过“Galileo”提供癌症筛查服务。像这样的平台似乎可以成为一种不同的健康思考方式,而不是只在出问题时才去看医生,也就是你所说的那种情况。
Hims&Hers deserves credit for targeting the most profitable areas, as it should . Do you think that something like artificial intelligence in healthcare could become an area where they can excel, turning into a feedback loop?
What I'm thinking is that I'm collecting a lot of data about my health. I wear a Garmin watch all the time. I have a Garmin scale. You know, this gathers information not only about my weight, but also my heart rate and how much exercise I do.
I can easily enter data related to what I eat. There are many interesting tools for this purpose. Then add to that the results of the laboratory tests. But how will all this be handled?
I mean, the challenge with visiting the doctor is that you go at a specific point in time, right ? For example, they measure your blood pressure. This is not your everyday blood pressure .
It's your blood pressure at that moment only. Therefore, they will make a medical decision or prescribe treatment for you based on that single moment. Now we are moving into a world where this data is available 24/7.
Therefore, it seems to me that having a platform that helps you live a healthier life consistently by being more proactive could be a positive thing. Some of the things we're talking about that Hims&Hers is bringing to market, such as peptides, have received the most attention in the last year or so.
This type of more proactive solution, such as conducting laboratory tests, would be a more proactive approach. They also offer a cancer screening service through "Galileo" . It seems that a platform like this could be a different way of thinking about health instead of only going to the doctor when something goes wrong , which is what you're talking about.
也许吧,但预防性就诊仍然受到鼓励,我的意思是,把体检或就医视为一次性事件而非一种持续的关系,是个人选择。这个选项可能是必要的。是的,我认为这确实是一个选项。这是我考虑到整个医疗生态后做出的选择,但没错。
是的,我的意思是这很好,而且你看,医生们正开始把持续数据纳入他们的系统。我的医生那里有专门的入口,你可以把他们的“MyChart”系统与“Google Health”连接起来,看到所有这些数据。
问题在于,而且我认为这将成为人工智能的一个障碍,那就是大多数医生会告诉你,并不存在“如果 A 发生,B 就会发生”这种简单的等式。健康远比这复杂得多。这既指向了收集所有这些数据所带来的机会,也表明其中包含的噪音远多于有用的信息。
也许是的,人工智能可以帮助过滤这些。但话说回来,我认为这会更复杂,而不是你想象的那种快速解决方案。这个机会究竟会让他们受益还是让其他人受益,很可能双方都会受益。但我不认为会有一个让你保持健康的魔法应用。
就像我不相信其中一些“改善生活”的方法给人们带来了好结果一样。所以,你知道,医疗领域有很多江湖骗术,但也存在真正改善的机会,所以我不想一概否定,我也不相信“Him”是通往天堂的道路。
Well, maybe, but preventative visits are still encouraged, and I mean that considering a physical exam or medical visit as a one-time event rather than an ongoing relationship is a personal choice.
This option may be necessary. Well, yes, I think it is indeed an option. This is the choice I made considering the healthcare ecosystem , but yes. Yes, I mean that's good, and look, doctors are starting to incorporate continuous data into their system.
There are dedicated places for my doctor where you can link their "MyChart" system to "Google Health" and see all that data . The problem, and I think this will be a hindrance to artificial intelligence, is that most doctors will tell you that there are no simple equations of the "if A happens, B will happen" type.
Health is much more complicated than that. This points to the opportunities available with the collection of all this data, but it also indicates that it contains a lot more noise than it is useful.
Perhaps yes, artificial intelligence can help filter that. But again, I think it will be more complicated, and not the quick fix you imagine. Whether that opportunity will benefit them or others, it is likely to benefit both parties.
But I don't think there will be a magic app to keep you healthy. Just as I do n't believe that some of these "life improvement" techniques have yielded good results for people .
So, you know, there's a lot of charlatanism in healthcare, but there are also real opportunities for improvement, so I don't want to be dismissive, and I don't believe that "Him" is the path to paradise.
我们会看看他们能否把这些东西发展得不再只是像今天这样一家产品公司。我认为他们正处于一个非常有趣的阶段。尤其是在 GLP-1 药物方面,我们今年早些时候看到了他们与 Novo Nordisk 的那场争斗,当时他们推出了一款复方药物,而 Novo Nordisk 说:等一下。
这太过分了,并且提起了诉讼。那场诉讼实际上并没有任何进展。那是一起专利案,可能要花五六年才能解决。所以他们最终和解,现在开始合作。这实际上是促成 Hem and Her 仅在上个季度收入增长的因素之一,因为那时影响才真正开始显现。
但这一效应将帮助该公司在 2026 年下半年实现超过 50% 的预期增长率。另一面是,他们为此放弃了一些利润率,因为他们是在与更大的制药公司合作。看看他们将如何尝试在体系内与制药公司合作会很有意思,利润率可能面临更大压力,直到他们达到一个拥有 300 万订阅用户就被认为很了不起的阶段。
但如果你有 2000 万或 3000 万,你现在就处于真正的强势地位,达到类似 Netflix 在内容采购上的阶段,那时你可以说:我们不需要你的产品。我们可以找别人。因此,我们会付给你略低一点的价格。
Well, we'll see if they are able to develop these things to become more than just a product company as they are today. I think they are at a really interesting stage. Particularly with regard to GLP-1 drugs, we saw that battle with Novo Nordisk earlier this year when they introduced a combination drug, and Novo Nordisk said: Hold on a moment.
This is going too far , and they have filed a lawsuit. That lawsuit didn't actually go anywhere. It was a patent case that could have taken five or six years to resolve. So they ended up making up and working together now.
This is one of the things that actually contributed to the growth of Hem and Her revenues during the last quarter only, because that was when the impact actually started to appear.
But this effect will help the company grow by an expected rate exceeding 50 % in the second half of 2026. The other side is that they are giving up some profit margins in return, because they are working with larger pharmaceutical companies.
It will be interesting to see how they try to work within the system with pharmaceutical companies, with the possibility of greater pressure on profit margins until they reach a point where having 3 million subscribers is considered great.
But if you have 20 or 30 million, you are now in a real position of power, reaching a stage similar to Netflix in content buying, where you say: We don't need your products. We can deal with someone else.
Therefore, we will pay you a slightly lower price.
我们会看看从财务角度看事情如何发展。我希望你就该公司的股票提出一个乐观的观点,我们稍后会接着讨论估值。但如果我们展望五年后的未来,而这家公司大获全胜,那是什么做对了?
We'll see how things go from a financial perspective. I want you to present an optimistic viewpoint regarding the company's stock, and we will move on to discussing the valuation shortly .
But if we look to the future five years from now and this company is a winner by a landslide , what went right?
他们持续增长。我的意思是,你提到了这一点,但看看他们目前的水平,他们的目标是大约 30 亿美元,而他们 2030 年的目标我认为是翻一番。所以我认为这只是同一套做法的延续,缓慢扩张。
正如我所说,我想知道他们还能在多少其他领域继续增长,但我认为他们成功转向了与品牌合作,这正在帮助他们。国际市场是一个真正的机会。他们经历了非常好的国际增长。既然他们已成为一个值得信赖的合作伙伴,他们能否提高每月 92 美元这个数字,能否获得更大的份额?
我相信有一种直接的方法可以做到这一点,尽管存在重大风险,但继续沿用同样的做法应该会随着时间带来增长。
Well, they continued to grow. I mean, you mentioned that, but look at their current level, they're targeting around $3 billion, and their goal for 2030 is to double that, I think.
So I think it's just a continuation of the same approach, with slow expansion. As I said, I wonder how many other areas they can continue to grow in, but I think they have managed to shift towards partnerships with brands, which is helping them.
The international market represents a real opportunity. They have experienced very good international growth . Now that they have become a trusted partner, can they increase that monthly figure of $92, and can they acquire a larger share?
I believe there is a straightforward way to do this, and although there are significant risks, continuing with the same approach should lead to growth over time.
是的,我认为这里的机会大到不容忽视。我们目前看到的是大约 30 亿美元的收入,但如果你展望未来,仅制药行业,更不用说就诊、保险等等,这个市场仅在美国就代表着数千亿美元。正如我提到的,他们不再只是一家美国公司,而是在向国际扩张。
因此,他们试图同时做很多事情。我的意思是,他们正试图成为医疗服务的中心枢纽。在我看来,这就是他们努力要达到的终极状态,而这简单来说意味着:当你有一个正当的问题时,他们是第一个应用,是你寻求答案时第一个求助的地方。
而如果他们已经有了来自你的手表或可穿戴设备的数据、你服用什么药物、你的体重秤显示什么,以及他们拥有的所有那些个人信息。于是你说:“嗯,我这几天不太舒服”,然后你量了体温,也许 6 小时后你就能拿到感冒药。
从商业角度看,这对他们来说有点像涅槃阶段。我的意思是,我们谈论的是收入不仅可能翻 10 倍,而是翻 100 倍,而这正是我们在这里寻找的那种机会。所以,当我看 Hims&Hers 乐观的一面时,我看到的是他们将成为客户的合作伙伴,而不仅仅是一次性的解决方案。
因此,看看他们能否实现这一点会很有意思。你知道,我给他们加了几项专长。你提到了实验室,更深入地了解它们真的很有意思,但我看到的是他们未来可能成为的样子所带来的大量机会,而不是他们今天的样子,而这本身就是很好的信息。
知道我的生理年龄略低于实际年龄是件好事。但是,你知道,我拿这个做什么呢?我究竟如何把它转化为饮食上的些许改善?那是他们的下一个阶段。
Yes, and I think the opportunity here is too great to ignore. We are looking at revenues of about $3 billion currently, but if you look ahead in the pharmaceutical industry alone, not to mention doctor visits, insurance and so on, the market represents hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States alone.
As I mentioned, they are no longer just an American company , but are expanding internationally. Therefore, they try to do many things at once. I mean, they are trying to become a central hub for healthcare services.
This, in my opinion, is the ultimate situation they are striving to reach, and it simply means: when you have a valid question, they are the first application and the first place you turn to in search of an answer.
And if they already have your data from your watch or wearable device , what medications you take, what your scale says, and all that personal information they have. So you say, "Well, I haven't felt well these past few days," and you take your temperature, and maybe you'll get cold medicine after 6 hours .
This is somewhat like a nirvana phase for them from a business perspective. I mean, we're talking about revenues that could not only multiply 10 times , but 100 times, and that's the kind of opportunity we're looking for here.
So, when I look at the optimistic side of Hims&Hers, I see that they will become a partner to their customers rather than just a one-time solution . Therefore, it will be interesting to see if they are able to achieve that.
You know, I added a few specializations to them. You mentioned laboratories, and learning more about them was really interesting, but I see a lot of opportunities for what they could become in the future rather than what they are today, and that's just good information.
It's great to know that my biological age is slightly less than my real age. But, you know, what am I going to do with that ? How will I actually turn that into a slight improvement in my diet ? That's the next stage for them.
我其实很想转向悲观的一方,因为我总体上对这家公司非常乐观。但我想知道,如果它最终没有成为一笔好的股票投资,你对这家公司长期的悲观看法是什么。
I really want to move to the pessimistic side, because I'm very optimistic about this company in general. But, I want to know what your pessimistic view is about the company in the long term if it doesn't work out as a good stock investment.
好,我们从几个层面来看这件事。首先,我刚才描述的一切也完全可能出自一场 Amazon 诊所的推介会。Hims 在这里有优势,但 Amazon 就是 Amazon,而对于那些与 Amazon 竞争过的人来说,事情并不总是对他们有利。
他们拥有大量数据,是不同的数据,但他们可以轻易地把它加入自己的系统。这里的竞争非常激烈。我认为我们只需承认这一点。其次,还有我所说的伊卡洛斯问题,也就是他们试图飞得足够高、越过极限,但又不能高到被烧毁。
他们试图在一个高度受监管的行业里带来根本性的改变,这需要走一条细线。我认为在当前这届政府下不会,但复方药房业务在某种程度上是通过一个可追溯到电影《生活多美好》时代的漏洞取得成功的,那时药品还没有制度化,当时有
Okay, let's look at this on several levels . First, everything I just described could have come from an Amazon clinic presentation as well. Hims has an advantage here, but Amazon is Amazon, and for people who have competed with Amazon, things don't always go well for them.
They have a lot of data, different data, but they can easily add it to their system. There is a lot of competition here. I think we just need to acknowledge that. Secondly, there is what I call the Icarus problem, which is that they try to fly high enough and overshoot the limits, but not so high that they get burned.
They are trying to bring about radical change in a highly regulated industry, which requires walking a fine line. I think not under the current administration, but the compounding pharmacy business has somewhat succeeded through a loophole dating back to the era of the movie "It's a Wonderful Life," before pharmaceuticals became institutionalized, when there were
值得称赞的是,他们把许多流程内部化以确保质量,我认为这对他们来说是一个好举措。但我认为,在他们如今所处的这个奇怪世界里,我怀疑这种现状长期来看不会维持下去。
It is to their credit that they moved many of the processes internally to ensure quality, and I think this was a good move for them . But I think that this strange world they are living in now, I doubt the status quo will remain in the long run.
最后,还有一个问题:长期来看医疗保健会是什么样子,保险将扮演什么角色;他们越是成为你的第一站,事情就变得越复杂,有时他们不得不与药房打交道,因为你无法建立一个廉价的解决方案。
Finally, there is a question about what healthcare will look like in the long term, and what role insurance will play; The more they become your first destination, the more complicated things become, and sometimes they have to deal with pharmacies because you cannot set up a cheap solution.
如果这种增长持续下去,我认为这是好生意,但如果他们实现十倍或二十倍的增长,他们将不得不进行许多目前宁愿避免的对话。所以,存在那种张力和那种阻力。随着他们扩张并获得更大的市场份额,他们会越来越像传统玩家,而不是颠覆者,那将是一个非常难以应对的世界。
If this growth continues, I think it's good business, but if they achieve ten or twenty times the growth, they will have to have a lot of conversations that they would prefer to avoid at the moment.
So, there is that tension and that resistance. As they expand and acquire a larger market share , they will look more and more like traditional players rather than game-changers, and that will be a very difficult world to deal with.
是的,我认为药物配方的挑战,即便在 6 个月前,我可能也会说它比我预期的挑战更大。如你所知,尤其是在 GLP-1 药物上,这算是一个相当特殊的事件。但现在他们正在与一些最大的制药公司合作,这确实是一件积极的事,也表明他们作为一家公司正在成熟,哪怕只是一点点,能够与这些公司合作。
Yes, I think the challenge of drug formulation even 6 months ago, I would have said it was a bigger challenge than I expected, perhaps. As you know, it was somewhat of an exceptional event with GLP-1 drugs in particular.
But now that they are working with some of the biggest pharmaceutical companies , that is really a positive thing, and shows that they are maturing, even if only a little, as a company to be able to work with these companies.
随着越来越多这类药品出现,看看 GLP-1 领域就是一个很好的例子。有许多产品出现,但谁在为消费者争取更低的价格,并向供应商施压要求降价?我认为 Hims 和 Hers 确实处在这一前沿。
因此,我认为这给他们带来了一些好感。这将导致价格下降。
As more of these pharmaceutical products emerge, look to the GLP-1 field as a great example. There are many products appearing, but who is standing up for consumers to lower prices and putting pressure on suppliers to reduce their prices?
I think Hims and Hers are really at the forefront of that . Therefore, I think this brings them some goodwill. This will lead to lower prices.
现在我们有了一家公司,它有经济动机把这些产品推向市场并说:“嘿,你知道吗?”“如果你要从我们这里花 20 美元买一种肽,那没问题。”“我们很乐意这么做。”“我们很乐意描述它。”
“而且我们会帮助追踪它对你健康的影响。”我认为这是一个非常值得探索的有趣领域。
Well, now we have a company that has the economic incentive to bring these products to market and say, "Hey, you know what?" "If you're going to buy a peptide from us for $20, that's fine."
"We're happy to do that." "We're happy to describe it." "And we'll help track the effect that has on your health." I think it's a really interesting place to explore.
因此,Hims&Hers 有许多选择。但危险在于,我真的认为这是一个竞争非常激烈的领域,而来自传统医疗行业的阻力很可能非常强。
Therefore, there are many options available to Hims&Hers. But the danger is, I really think this is a very competitive field , and resistance from the traditional healthcare sector is likely to be very strong.
所以,从一届政府到下一届政府的这种监管挑战很可能是一个大问题,因为,你知道,在拜登政府下你之前可以就某些肽做文章的东西,现在处于一个法律上模糊的地带。而现在特朗普政府上台了,其中一些肽正在从中退出。
如果你试图推动健康的边界,即便你试图完全以正确的方式做事,这也是一种奇怪的处境。
So, this regulatory challenge from one administration to the next is likely to be a big one, because, you know, something that you could make peptides about before, under the Biden administration, is now in a legally ambiguous area.
And now the Trump administration comes along , and some of those peptides are coming out of there. It's a strange situation to be in if you're trying to push the boundaries of health, even if you're trying to do things exactly the right way .
话虽如此,投资全在于风险与回报,我完全承认 Hims & Hers 是当今风险最高的股票之一,因为一切都可能出错。可能会有一起诉讼导致公司破产。
That said, investing is all about risk and reward, and I fully acknowledge that Hims & Hers is one of the highest-risk stocks out there today because everything can go wrong. There may be a lawsuit that could lead to the company's bankruptcy.
但鉴于我们目前的情况,企业价值与销售额之比约为 2.9,而 5 年复合年增长率为 67.5%。正如我提到的,过去一年这些数字有一些波动,但预计今年下半年增长率将超过 50%。
But given our current situation, the enterprise value-to-sales ratio is around 2.9, and the 5-year compound annual growth rate is 67.5 percent. As I mentioned, there has been some fluctuation in the figures over the past year, but the growth rate is expected to exceed 50% in the second half of this year.
听着,我认为如果你想冒险,在我看来它比其当前估值所暗示的更具投机性。因此,由于估值的原因,我不认为它是一个显而易见的选择,但我认为如果你意识到风险等等,它适合在一个充分分散的投资组合中买入。
我可能对肽这个话题比你更悲观,纯粹更多是出于健康原因。我真的认为它是一个投机性投资组合的好候选。请务必确保你明白自己在买什么。
Look, I think if you want to take a risk, I see it as more speculative than its current valuation suggests. Therefore, I don't think it's an obvious choice because of the valuation, but I think it's for buying within a well-diversified portfolio if you are aware of the risks and such .
I am probably more pessimistic about the subject of peptides than you are, purely for health reasons more than anything else. I really think it's a good candidate for a speculative investment portfolio.
Please just make sure you understand what you are buying.
是的,我完全同意这一点。这类股票可能增值 10 倍或 100 倍。事情可能出错,但如果进展顺利,那正是我作为投资者喜欢的那种根本性改变,因为你看到的是可能修复一个真正失灵体系的公司。
Yes, I completely agree with that. This type of stock may increase in value 10 or 100 times. Things could go wrong , but if they go well, that's the kind of radical change I like as an investor, because you're looking at companies that could fix a system that's really broken.
现在,我可以直接打开我的应用,打开“Hims”应用。我妻子有“Hers”应用。也许未来我们会有一个给孩子用的应用,这样当你的孩子感冒时,你可能会找到一些解决方案。这就是我说的意思。
孩子自己诊断。嗯,显然孩子不做诊断,但我想说:“你好,我知道这是耳部感染。”我不想为了被告知这是耳部感染而花 150 美元去看医生。在我们这个数字时代,这些是容易摘取的果实。
Now, I can simply open my app, and open the "Hims" app. My wife has the " Hers" app. Perhaps we will have an app for children in the future, so when your child catches a cold, you may find some solutions.
That's what I'm talking about. Children diagnose themselves . Well, obviously children don't make diagnoses, but I would like to say, "Hello, I know this is an ear infection." I don't want to have to pay $150 to go to the doctor only to be told it's an ear infection.
These things are easy fruits to pick in our digital age.
然而,事情可能会变得更糟,但我认为如果这家公司继续以超过 30% 的速度增长——它已证明有能力做到——而且行业规模也在那里,那么这是一个有吸引力的价格,你可以指望收入增长。你可以获得一些利润率的扩张。
那些利润率目前接近于零。我预计这种情况会持续,因为他们目前的重点是增长而非利润。
However, things could get worse, but I think if this company continues to grow at a rate above 30%, which it has proven capable of, and the size of the industry is there, then this is an attractive price where you can count on revenue growth.
You can get some expansion in profit margins. Those margins are currently approaching zero. I expect this situation to continue, as their current focus is on growth rather than profits.
对于一家以这种速度增长的公司,其市销率为 2.9,而我们见过以这种速度增长的公司以 100 倍销售额交易。因此,我不指望它未来达到 100 倍销售额,但倍数扩张是这笔投资的一大部分。因此,我相信未来有许多潜在收益。
The company's value-to-sales ratio is 2.9 for a company growing at this rate, and we have seen companies growing at this rate traded at 100 times their sales. Therefore, I don't expect it to reach 100 times sales in the future, but expanding multiples is a big part of the investment.
Therefore, I believe there are many potential gains in the future.
这个频道对 $HIMS 的历次判断
The Motley Fool 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。