$PLTR · The Motley Fool · 2026-11-03
PLTR 交出了出色的一个季度,但市场的负面反应是合理的:其前瞻市盈率达 110 倍,定价已臻完美,而商业预订增长放缓至 11%,净新增客户仅 33 家。政府业务增长无法支撑这一估值,PLTR 的商业增长只是良好、并非爆发式,因此在说话者看来其估值仍说不通。
逐段跳播
广告之后,我们将深入探讨 Shopify 和 Palanteer 的财报。Palanteer 下跌约 3%。盘前反应要糟糕得多。
Coming up after the break, we're going to dive into Shopify and Palanteer's earnings. Palunteers are down about 3%. Pre-market, the reaction was much much worse.
而 Palanteer 可能比预期稍慢一些。所以,市场在这里略微有些不及预期。但各位,你们看到了什么?Lou,你关注 Palanteer 比 Shopify 多。Matt,你更关注 Shopify。
那我们先从你开始谈 Palanteer。你在这份最新的财报里看到了什么?这是过度反应、反应不足,还是意料之中?
and Palanteer was perhaps a little bit slower than expected. So, a little bit of slightly missed expectations in the in the market here. But guys, what were you seeing? Uh, Lou, you follow Palunteer more than Shopify.
Matt, more Shopify. So, we'll start with you on Palunteer. What did you see in this most earnings report? And was this an overreaction, underreaction kind of part for the course?
我认为这是正确的反应,但我们要说清楚。这是两份出色的财报。有趣的是,这两家公司重叠不多。我不认为他们在争夺很多客户,但这两家的故事几乎一样。
>> I think it's the right reaction, but let's be clear here. These were two excellent reports. And it's funny because these companies don't have a lot of overlap. I don't think they're competing for a lot of customers, but this was almost the same story on both.
而我们看到的是,这是一个预期故事。两家公司都交出了出色的业绩。在真空中,这两家公司的表现正是你希望企业做到的。
And what we're, it's an expectation story. Both companies delivered great results. Both companies that in a vacuum, these are what you want the business to be doing.
但当你像 Palanteer 那样以 110 倍远期市盈率交易,或者像 Shopify 那样以仅 80 倍预期市盈率交易时,正如老话所说,你被定价为完美。任何不完美都会让你受伤。
But when you're Palanteer and you're trading at 110 times forward earnings or with Shopify trading at only 80 times expected earnings, you are, as the cliche goes, priced for perfection.
And anything short of perfection gets you stung.
在Palunteer这边,季度表现很棒,但商业预订量比我们看到的要慢。我们上次的环比数字有点疯狂,增长了153%,但自上个季度以来预订量只增长了11%。这可不是110倍远期市盈率该有的数字。
这是他们自2023年以来最低的预订量增长。所以,还是那句话,这不是你看到的那种势头。客户数是长期以来最低的。他们只净增了33个新客户。
On the uh Palunteer side, great quarter, but slower commercial bookings than we saw. We kind of had a crazy quarter-over-arter number last time, 153% up, but 11% bookings growth since the last quarter.
That's not 110 times forward earnings sort of number. It was their lowest bookings gained since 2023. So again, not the momentum you see. Lowest customer at in a long time. They only added 33 net new customers.
所以季度很棒,增长很棒,你想要看到的一切都有。但话说回来,当你以这样的预期估值交易时,真的很难让市场满意。果不其然,市场并不满意。
So great quarter, great grow growth, everything you want to see. But again, when you're trading at these expectations, it is really hard to please the market. And sure enough, the market wasn't pleased.
是啊,如今在市场上,高预期总是最难实现的事情之一。不过我想追问一下,因为我听到我们之前讨论过Palunteer很多次,你说过的一点是,政府只能带来有限的增长,因为政府能分给Palanteer的钱就那么多。
Yeah, high expectations is always one of the hardest things to achieve in the market these day. I I do want to follow up though because I heard we've discussed Palunteer many times before and one of the things that you have said is you know government can only result in so much growth because government only has so much money to hand out to Palanteer.
我们仍然看到这项业务的政府侧增长相对强劲。也许不像以前那么快了,但整体上仍然可观。政府合同增长率是不是比你最初预想的还有更大的空间?
We're still seeing relatively strong growth on the government side of this business. Uh maybe not again not the as fast as it used to be but still respectable overall. Is there perhaps more legs to the government contract growth rate than you might have originally anticipated?
还是那句话,一切都关乎预期。我从来、我从来没想说过Palunteer的政府业务不能增长,但它增长的程度不足以证明其估值倍数的合理性。它必须在商业侧承担重任才能接近那个水平,因为,还是那句话,尽管我们谈论五角大楼、谈论万亿美元的预算,其中7亿美元只是用于士兵薪酬、家庭医疗保健之类的事情,即使你拿下了所有收入,也无法获得足够的收入来证明这个倍数。
>> Again, it's all about expectations. I never I I never meant to say if I said that Palunteer couldn't grow its government business, but it can't grow it to the extent that you justify its multiple.
It has to do the heavy lifting on the commercial side to get anywhere near because again for all we talk about the Pentagon you know a trillion dollar budget 700 million of that goes into just kind of uh soldier pay health care for families things like that you know you just can't capture enough revenue even if you captured all of the revenue to justify the multiple
所以我们需要商业侧出现疯狂的增长,而我们得到的略少一些,我们只得到了还不错的增长。我们没有得到疯狂的增长。我们没有得到完全的疯狂。我认为,还是那句话,这没问题。这很棒。大多数公司会求着要他们这样的问题,但对于抱有高预期的投资者来说,这就是个问题。
so we do need we need just crazy sort of growth on the commercial side we got slightly less we only got gaga growth grow. We didn't get crazy growth. We didn't get full on crazy.
And I think again, it's it's it's fine. It's great. Most companies would beg to have their problems, but for investors who have high expectations, it is a problem.
它先是大跌,然后又涨回来了。所以并不是一条直线。是的。但我试图理解Palunteer的估值已经大约五年了,到现在还没能做到。
>> Well, it it it tanked and then came back. So there there was it wasn't a straight path. >> Yes. But uh I've been trying to make sense of Palunteer's valuation for about five years now and I haven't been able to do it yet.
观察点
这个频道对 $PLTR 的历次判断
The Motley Fool 在这只股票上共 3 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。