QLYS 值得关注：Genius 评级达 95%，跑赢 95% 的股票，形成双重突破形态，并在大盘下跌趋势中保持强势。在熊市中上涨的股票值得关注，熊市结束后它很可能成为领涨股；不过该形态仅在约 60% 的情况下奏效。
逐段跳播
过去两周我在一些视频里谈到过 Qualys，它也出现在我们的选股工具和股票报告中。Qualys 股票获得了95%的 Genius 评级，这意味着它的表现优于数据库中95%的其他股票。因此，它拥有非常强的评级。
I've talked about Qualys in some of my videos over the past two weeks, and it has appeared in our stock screening tools and in our stock reports. Qualys stock received a Genius rating of 95%, meaning it outperforms 95% of other stocks in the database. Therefore, it has a very strong rating .
最好是在价格高的时候买入，在高位时卖出。但看看这个漂亮的双重形态。价格突破了，但由于成交量低没能维持住，然后它回落并回测，进入卖出区，现在价格再次突破。
It is best to buy when the price is high, and to sell when it is high. But look at this wonderful double pattern . The price broke through, but couldn't sustain it due to low trading volume, then it came back and tested it, entered the selling zone, and now the price is breaking through again.
40%的成功突破会失败。所以，我们并不完全确定。我们试图做的是提高成功的概率，这就是我们研究形态的原因，因为这些形态往往能以更高的概率实现突破。但它并不总是奏效。即使形态形成得正确，也有60%的情况成功，40%的情况失败。
40% of successful hacks fail. So, we're not entirely sure. What we are trying to do is increase the probability of success, and that is why we study patterns, because these are the patterns that tend to achieve breakthroughs with a higher probability.
But it doesn't always work. It succeeds in 60% of cases and fails in 40% of cases , even if it is formed correctly.
所以，我们有一只很有潜力的股票。这里我们使用 Promising Market Timing 指标，它表明我们的股票很有潜力。但这里的市场处于下跌趋势。这不太好。然而，尽管市场下跌，这只股票的表现依然不错。
So, we have a promising stock. Here we use the Promising Market Timing indicator, which indicates that our stock is promising. But the market here is in a downward trend. This is not good.
However, despite the market downturn, the stock is still performing well .
我总是说：“看，股票才是领涨者。市场是助推者，但如果你有一只股票在熊市中上涨，那就是一只值得关注的股票，因为一旦熊市结束，它很可能成为领涨股。”至少这是我在这些图表中注意到的。
I always say, " Look, the stock is the leader. The market is the facilitator, but if you have a stock that has risen in a bear market, that's a stock worth watching, because once the bear market is over, it's likely to become a leader ." At least that's what I noticed in these graphs.