Shopify 业务质量高,增长加速,并受益于 AI 电商顺风;但按每股 160 美元、经营利润 112 倍计算,目前不值得持有。合理价值约为每股 100 美元,35-45 倍市盈率尚属合理,只有股价跌至 100 美元附近才值得建立跟踪仓位。
逐段跳播
所以,一年半前,我向你们推荐了 Shopify,称它是我们研究过的最好的企业之一,然后却告诉大家不要买。而这只股票自那以来几乎翻了一倍。
So, a year and a half ago, I pitched Shopify to you and called it one of the best businesses we'd ever studied and then told everyone not to buy it. And the stock has nearly doubled since.
这是因为自那以来,这家企业的表现绝对是非凡的。我们说的是连续五个季度增长超过30%,而且是在每季度1150亿美元GMB的规模上。
And that's because the business has done absolutely phenomenal since then. We're talking five straight quarters of 30% plus growth at a $115 billion GMB per quarter scale.
而在这个过程中,它已经成为AI智能体在线购物方式的重要组成部分。那么,这只股票在今天翻倍的价格上是否仍然值得持有?
And along the way, it's become a big part of how AI agents shop online. and is it possible that the stock is still worth owning at double the price today?
Shopify 可以说是一个遗漏的错误。我们当时错过了它,而也许我们本不该错过。我实际上认为,就AI真正在实体经济中显现而言,Shopify 可能是目前最有意思的公司之一。
Shopify was arguably a mistake of omission. So, we passed on it when perhaps we shouldn't have. I actually think Shopify might be one of the most interesting companies out there right now when it comes to AI actually showing up in the real economy.
但除了 Meta 之外,大多数其他公司看起来可能受到的威胁更大。而 Shopify 绝对不属于这一类。所以,当我们离开去梳理这些企业的时候,Shopify 成了为AI智能体如何在互联网上购买东西设定标准的公司,而用AI智能体购物,或者如今人们所说的智能体电商,是我在关于 Meta 的那一期节目里谈了很多的东西,而 Shopify 是理解AI可能如何塑造购物未来的拼图中相当重要的一块——如果那确实是我们应该走向的方向的话。
But apart from Meta, most other companies probably seem that they're more threatened. And Shopify definitely does not belong to those. So, while we were away curating their businesses, Shopify became the company setting the standard for how AI agents buy things on the internet and shopping with AI agents, or what people nowadays call agent e-commerce, is something that I talked a lot about in my episode on Meta and Shopify is pretty important piece of the puzzle for understanding how AI may shape the future of shopping if that is actually where we're supposed to go.
与此同时,这家企业的增长已经加速到疫情以来未曾见过的水平,而估值问题如果说有什么变化的话,只是变得更难、也更有意思了,我认为。
And at the same time, the business has accelerated to growth rates it hasn't seen since the pandemic, and the valuation question has, if anything, only gotten harder and a lot more interesting too, I think.
所以,Shopify 是全球领先的商务平台。基本上,它就是让任何人都能开店的软件,无论你是从厨房餐桌上起步的首次创业者,还是像 Skims、Supreme 这样的品牌,实际上现在连 General Motors 和 Starbucks 的商品商店都是通过 Shopify 运营的。
And so, Shopify is the world's leading commerce platform. And basically, it is the software that lets anyone, whether you're a first-time founder working from your kitchen table, or your brand like Skims, Supreme, and actually even now General Motors and and Starbucks all have their merchandise stores run through Shopify.
所以,有了 Shopify,任何人都可以搭建自己的虚拟店面、处理支付、管理库存、处理配送和税务,在网上、线下、社交媒体上销售,如今甚至在AI聊天机器人里销售,全部都在一个平台上完成。
Uh and so, with Shopify, anyone can build their virtual storefront, process payments, manage inventory, handle shipping and taxes, sell online, in person, on social media, and now even inside of of AI chatbots, all from one platform.
所以,他们为175个国家的数百万家企业提供支持,美国所有电商中超过14%通过 Shopify 商家流转。感觉 Amazon 基本上已经存在了永恒之久,而 Shopify 才在10到15年前出现,至少那是我注意到它的时候。
And so, they power millions of businesses across 175 countries, and over 14% of all e-commerce in the United States flows through Shopify merchants. It feels like Amazon has been there for basically eternity, and Shopify only came up 10-15 years ago, at least that's when it came onto my map.
而现在,据说他们占了美国电商的14%,这绝对是极其了不起的。
And now they're supposed to be there for 14% of e-commerce in the US, which is just absolutely uh tremendous.
是的,所以有两个引擎,一个叫订阅解决方案,这相当直接。使用 Shopify 要付软件费,商家每月支付从可能低至39美元,到企业客户每月数千美元不等,通过一个叫 Shopify Plus 的产品。
Yeah, so there are two engines, and one is called subscription solutions, and that's pretty straightforward. There's a a software fee for for using Shopify, where merchants pay anywhere from as low as maybe $39 a month to for enterprise clients, thousands of dollars a month through product called Shopify Plus.
所以,订阅业务是较小的、但非常稳定的引擎,为公司提供动力,因为你多少知道每个月都会得到这些经常性现金流。而更大的引擎是他们所谓的商家解决方案,Shopify 从中抽取通过平台流转的实际交易的一小部分。
所以,这首先可能是支付处理,但也包括通过 Shopify Capital 提供贷款、提供折扣运费标签、协助货币兑换、提供广告工具之类的事情。
And and so the subscription business is the smaller, but very much the steadier engine powering the company, because you kind of know every month you're going to get these recurring cash flows.
The bigger engine though is is what they call merchant solutions, where Shopify takes a small cut of the actual commerce flowing through the platform. So, that might be payment processing above all, but also things like lending through Shopify Capital, or offering discounted shipping labels, facilitating currency conversion, providing advertising tools, those kind of things.
而对我来说,这是 Shopify 和 Intuit 作为金融科技平台所能做的事情的一个非常基本的例证。基本上,它告诉你,Shopify 的商家每卖出1美元的商品,抽成率就是 Shopify 通过以不同方式帮助促成交易——从管理网站到甚至协助物流——实际留下多少美分。
And to me, that's a really basic illustration of of what both Shopify and Intuit can do as as these fintech platforms. Where basically, it you know, tells you for every dollar of merchandise that Shopify's merchants sell, the take rate is how many cents Shopify actually keeps for helping facilitate the transaction in different ways from, you know, managing the website to even helping with the logistics.
所以,你刚才谈到的所有业务单元,基本上就是把业务垂直整合进商家随后所做的事情里,这是一种提高抽成率的杠杆,因为你对商家来说变得越来越重要。
So, all the business units that you basically just talked about, right, that sort of vertically integrate the business into what a merchant then does is a way to have a lever to take up the take rate, because you get more and more important for the merchant.
所以,对 Shopify 来说,这个数字目前大约是每美元3美分,其中约0.8美分来自订阅,然后平均2.2美分来自商家解决方案。
So, for Shopify, that number is currently roughly 3 cents on the dollar and about 0. 8 cents of that is coming from subscriptions and then 2.2 cents for merchant solutions on average.
所以,看涨理由的很大一部分是,随着 Shopify 将更多服务附加到更多商家客户身上,这个抽成率会随着时间慢慢上升,因为再次强调,这是你相对于商家所拥有的杠杆。
So, a big part of the bull case was, you know, that this take rate would slowly creep up over time as Shopify attaches more services to more of their merchant customers because again, it's, you know, leverage that you have compared to the merchant.
我想回到我们上次谈到的一句话,因为我认为它能让我们了解 Shopify 内部至少是如何看待自己的。用 Shopify 首席执行官 Tobi Lütke 的话说,他说:“亚马逊是在试图建立一个帝国,而我们是在武装反叛者。”
这基本上就是你所看到的 Shopify 在做什么的图景。
And I want to go back to a quote that we talked about last time because I think it gives some insight into how Shopify internally, at least, perceives itself and in the words of Shopify's CEO, Tobi Lütke, he said, "Amazon is trying to build an empire and we are trying to arm the rebels."
That's basically where you have this, you know, picture of what Shopify is doing.
我认为这种框架非常有道理,尤其是在疫情期间及之后不久,因为当时有所有这些电商公司和商家纷纷进入电商、在线销售。
And I think that framing made a lot of sense, especially during and shortly thereafter, because, you know, you had all of these e-commerce companies and just merchants going into e-commerce, selling online.
这是个很好的观点,让我们来看看过去一年半里,随着股价翻倍,这家公司实际表现如何。所以,当我们覆盖 Shopify 时,营收大约以每年26%的速度增长,而最大的问题是这种增长能否持续。
It's a great point and and let's get to what the business has actually done over the last year and a half as its stock has doubled. And so, when we covered Shopify, revenue was growing at about 26% a year and the big question was whether that growth could last.
嗯,它绝对没有放缓,反而加速了,而且幅度很大。2025年,商品交易总额,也就是 Shopify 平台上所有售出商品的总价值,达到了3780亿美元,增长了29%,然后营收突破了115亿美元,增长了30%。
这是 Shopify 自疫情以来最快的年度增长率,然后自由现金流达到了20亿美元。
And well, it definitely did not slow down, it sped up and and actually by a lot. For 2025, gross merchandise volume, that the total value of everything sold across Shopify, hit $378 billion, up up 29% and then the revenue crossed $11.5 billion, which was up 30%.
That's Shopify's fastest annual growth rate since the pandemic and then free cash flow hit $2 billion.
现在,我认为可以肯定地说,2025年对 Shopify 来说是相当不错的一年,但我听说2026年只会变得更好。
Now, I think it's safe to say that 2025 has been a a pretty good year for Shopify, but I heard 2026 is only supposed to be getting better.
嗯,不知怎么的,确实如此。第一季度营收增长了34%,第二季度公司直接把新闻稿标题定为“Shopify 交出亮眼成绩”,而他们确实做到了。他们在单个季度实现了1160亿美元的商品交易总额,增长了32%。
毛利润增长了近三分之一,营业收入增长了三分之二,然后还有相当健康的自由现金流利润率。
Well, somehow, yes. Q1 revenues grew 34% and Q2 the company literally titled its press release as Shopify delivers big and they did. They they delivered $116 billion of gross merchandise value in a single quarter and that was up 32%.
You had gross profit up by almost a third, operating income up by 2/3 and then a pretty healthy free cash flow margin.
所以,管理层称这是一个怪兽级的季度,但既然他们已经连续五个季度实现30%以上的商品交易总额增长,我会说这是一个怪兽级的一年,甚至更多。
And so, management called it a monster quarter, but now that they've hit five quarters in a row of of 30% plus gross merchandise value growth, I would say it's been a monster year and more.
我认为,当你看到 Shopify 的规模时,这相当了不起,对吧?他们在2025年第四季度实现的营收超过了2020年全年的营收。这仅仅相隔五年,对吧?所以,一个季度的规模就超过了整个疫情繁荣年,任何当时关注市场的人都知道,尤其是电商公司和支付公司,在2020年疫情爆发时都表现很好。
I think it's quite remarkable when you look at the scale of Shopify, right? They did more revenue in the fourth quarter of 2025 than they did in the entire year of 2020. That's only five years apart, right?
So, one quarter was bigger than the whole pandemic boom year, which anybody who looked at the markets back then, we know that, you know, especially e-commerce companies and also payment companies, they had a good year in 2020 when the pandemic hit.
更棒的是,这是全面性的。所以,不仅仅是某一个地区在增长。北美增长了28%。欧洲实际上超过了这个速度,剔除汇率波动后增长了34%,线下销售增长了约32%,然后 B2B,也就是企业之间的批发商务,几年前在 Shopify 上几乎不存在,在第二季度增长了76%,而前一年已经翻了一番。
And even better is that this is coming across the board. So, it's not only one region growing. North America grew 28%. Europe actually outpaced that by going 34% excluding currency swings and in-person sales grew about 32% and then B2B, which is, you know, wholesale commerce between businesses, which barely existed on Shopify just a few years ago, that grew 76% in Q2 after already doubling the year before.
好的,明确一点,B2B 76%的增长绝对是惊人的。我们覆盖的公司中,没有多少能拿出这样的数字,尤其是在 Shopify 这样的规模上。
All right, just to be absolutely clear, 76% growth in B2B is is absolutely wild. there are not that many businesses that we cover but can, you know, pull off those numbers, especially at the scale of Shopify.
既然我们现在在列举数据,这里还有一个令人难以置信的:根据公司首席财务官的说法,自2025年初以来,Shopify 商家已经占据了美国所有增量电商支出的近一半。
Since we're dropping off stats right now, here is another incredible one because according to the company's CFO, since the start of 2025, Shopify merchants have captured nearly half of all incremental e-commerce dollars in the United States.
所以,我们显然不是在说全部电商市场份额的一半,而是全部增量增长的一半。这真的很了不起,对吧?我的意思是,过去几年有大量的增长,尤其是在电商领域,其中一半流向了 Shopify。
所以,过去一年美国电商每新增一美元的支出,大约有50美分流经了 Shopify 的店铺。
So, we're not talking about half of all e-commerce market share, obviously, you know, in total, but half of all incremental growth. And that's really something, right? I mean, there's a whole lot of growth in the last couple of years, especially in e-commerce, and half of that is going to Shopify.
So, for every new dollar of US e-commerce spending in the last year, roughly 50 cents has gone through Shopify's store.
所以,当你把这一点与我们之前对 Shopify 的预期相比时,我的天,我们当时看起来确实非常看空。而在表面之下,推动 Shopify 飞轮的核心动力似乎确实在加速。
So, when you match that up with what we thought would happen for Shopify, I mean, gosh, we we did look incredibly bearish. And under the hood, the core dynamics propelling Shopify's flywheel do seem to be speeding up.
如果你看看过去两个季度签约 Shopify 的公司,你就能很好地了解情况如何。我的意思是,我们说的是通用汽车、星巴克、欧莱雅、雅诗兰黛、Coach、Michael Kors、Keurig、Dr. Pepper、Sonos、Amer Sports(旗下拥有 Wilson 和 Salomon)、Guess、Avon、Claire's 和 Canada Goose。
And and if you just look at the companies from the past two quarters who have signed on to Shopify, you get a pretty good idea of how that's gone. I mean, we're talking General Motors, Starbucks, L'Oreal, Estee Lauder, Coach, Michael Kors, Keurig, Dr. Pepper, Sonos, Amer Sports, which owns Wilson and and Salomon, uh Guess, Avon, Claire's, and Canada Goose.
所以,作为大型企业更换电商平台真的不是开玩笑的。这证明了 Shopify 能够说服商家相信这是他们最后一次迁移,Shopify 可能是他们永久的归宿,而这足以证明经历更换平台的所有麻烦是值得的。
And so, switching e-commerce platforms as a large enterprise is is really no joke. So, it's a testament to Shopify being able to pitch merchants on this being their final migration, uh Shopify being their perhaps their forever home, and that being uh enough to justify going through all the trouble of of switching
我的意思是,从内部来看,当你想到所有员工的时候,对吧?如果你告诉他们必须每6个月就更换一次这些供应商,我觉得他们不会太喜欢这个消息。
I mean, internally, when you think about all the employees, right? If you tell them that you have to switch those providers every 6 months, um I think they wouldn't like that message too much.
是啊,我们来看看 Shopify 飞轮开始运转的第二个部分,这可以从他们的客户留存率和客户群组数据中看出来。在 Shopify 上年销售额达到100万美元的商家,留存率是92%。
而达到1000万美元的,留存率是97%。然后,如果我们看他们追溯到2015年第一季度、也就是11年前的群组数据,那批客户现在的季度收入是当年的3.3倍。
uh yeah, let's look at the the second piece of Shopify's flywheel coming to life, and we can see that in their customer retention and cohorts. And so, merchants who reached $1 million in annual sales on Shopify have a 92% retention rate.
And then at $10 million, it's 97%. And then, if we look at their cohort data going back to the first quarter 2015, so 11 years ago, that cohort of customers is now doing 3.3 times the quarterly revenue it did back then.
所以,随着时间推移,客户在 Shopify 上花的钱越来越多。这些老客户一直在增加支出,而新的客户群组不断进来,规模越来越大。这些层次相互叠加,这正是这家公司作为复利机器取得如此惊人成功的重要原因。
So, customers are spending more money with Shopify over time. And And so, these old customers just keep spending more, and then new cohorts come in and and get bigger and bigger.
And And those layers stack on each other, and that's a huge part of why the company has had this incredible success as a compounder.
但显然,如果你使用 Shopify,你会看到大得多的、尤其是从留存率来看的锁定效应。而且它要强大得多,因为它整合了众多垂直领域,作为商家你在 Shopify 上花钱。尤其是看那个2015年群组的数据,简直有点不可思议。他们现在的规模是11年前的3倍多,对吧?
But obviously, you know, you have the much larger, especially if you look at the retention rates, um lock-in if you use Shopify. And it's way more powerful because of all the verticals that it's integrated in with, you know, you're spending money as a merchant on Shopify.
Especially if you look at that 2015 cohort stat, it's kind of incredible. Over three times is what they were doing 11 years ago, right?
我想说我们是在过度吹捧 Shopify,但我确实,我的意思是,我认为这些数字本身就说明了一切。我想说的第三点是,最能说明他们飞轮在运转的,是支付这一块。
>> I I would say that we're we're overhyping Shopify, but I I I do I mean, I think the numbers speak for themselves. And And the the third point that that I would make is that uh to best illustrate their their flywheel working would be on the payments front.
现在,Shopify 的支付系统处理了通过他们平台、通过他们客户的所有商品交易总额中的68%。这比一年前上升了4个百分点。而且现在已经在40个国家上线。
And so, Shopify's payments now process 68% of all of the gross merchandise value that goes through their platform, goes through their customers. And that's up four percentage points in a year. And it's also live in 40 countries now.
还有 Shop Pay,这是他们的一键结账功能。它的累计交易额突破了400美元。现在处理了 Shopify 美国支付量的一半以上。
And and with Shop Pay, this is their one-click customer checkout. Uh that crossed $400 in lifetime volume. And and now handles more than half of Shopify's US payment volume.
所以,这真的,我们一直在用“不可思议”这个词。而它确实如此。我们在最初那期节目里谈到的另一件事,是他们的抽成率随时间缓慢上升的想法。我们也看到这确实发生了。具体来说,在商家解决方案方面,抽成率从去年年初的约2.2%上升到一年后的2.4%。
听起来变化很小,但在每年超过400美元的销售额上,每0.01个百分点大约值4000万美元的收入。
So, that's really uh we keep using that word incredible. Uh and it really is. And uh the other thing we talked about in our original episode was this idea of of their take rate creeping up over time.
Uh and we've seen that unfold, too. Uh namely, uh with the merchant solutions, the take rate went from about 2. 2% early last year to 2.4% a year later. And it sounds like a really tiny change, but on more than $400 of sales a year, every hundredth of a percentage point is worth roughly 40 million in revenue.
单看他们处理的交易量,他们自己的支付系统就非常惊人。如果你看很多支付公司,看到市场竞争变得多么激烈,然后你看到一个主要做电商的玩家,比如 Shopify,仅通过自己的支付系统就能产生这么多钱,这真是个惊人的数字,这个词又来了,但到目前为止,我想我们可以这样总结。
>> Just looking at how much volume they process, their own payment system is incredible. If you look at a lot of payment companies and you see how much more competitive the market gets, and then you see a player that's generally in e-commerce, like Shopify, generates so much money through their payment system itself, it's just it's an incredible stat, you know, there's this word again, but so far, I think we can summarize it that way.
听起来我们当初对这家公司如此乐观,方向上是对的,但也许我们没有充分认识到事情能或会发展得多么好、对他们多么有利,至少短期内是这样。
It sounds like we were, let's say, directionally right to be so optimistic about the business, but maybe we didn't fully appreciate just how well things could or would work out and go for them, at least in the short term.
我认为对我来说的一个启示是,如果你要押注那些数字好得惊人的公司,就像 Shopify 所实现的那样,你必须要有极强的信念。否则,你就有可能大错特错。如果你为一家公司付了过高的价格,那是相当可怕的事情。
And I think a takeaway for me is that if you're going to underwrite numbers that just jump off the page, like Shopify has achieved, you have to have a ton of conviction. And you know, otherwise, you just risk being massively off.
And that's a quite scary thing if you overpay for a company,
我们最初报道 Shopify 时,它还有未偿还的可转换债券,而且显然还有每年稀释股东权益的历史。从那以后,现在我看资产负债表,他们几乎全部用现金偿还了可转换债券。我记得2025年底时,公司有约60亿美元的现金和投资,零债务。
When we first covered Shopify, it still had convertible notes outstanding and obviously also a history of diluting shareholders every single year. And since then, when I look at the balance sheet now, they repaid the convertibles almost entirely in cash.
I think it ended in 2025 with about $6 billion of cash and investments and zero debt.
然后今年2月,董事会批准了 Shopify 史上首个股票回购计划,规模为20亿美元,6月又追加了30亿美元。所以到现在总共是50亿美元。而大约19亿美元,也就是接近20亿,已经在2026年上半年执行了。
所以他们回购的股票数量并不小,但显然你得告诉我,你对今天这个变化怎么看。
And then in February of this year, the board authorized Shopify's first ever share repurchase program with $2 billion of capital, then added another $3 billion in June. And so it's $5 billion in total by now.
And about $1.9 billion, so almost two, was already executed in the first half of 2026. So it's not a modest amount of stock that they are buying back, but obviously you got to tell me what do you think about it in terms of the variation today.
对一家过去每年都大幅稀释股东权益的公司来说,这是一个巨大的转变。我的意思是,那曾是我们对 Shopify 最大的担忧之一。我预计,既然他们已经通过回购开创了这个先例,未来股本数量会继续下降,或者至少大概率会持平。
会有很大的压力要求他们继续确保回购足够多的股票,以保证股权激励不会导致股本数量增加。
>> It's a big shift for a company that that used to dilute shareholders pretty massively every single year. I mean, that was one of our biggest concerns with Shopify. And you know, I expect the share count will will continue to decline going forward or at least probably be flat now that they've set this precedent with buybacks.
There'll be a lot of pressure to continue to ensure that they're buying back enough to to make sure that stock based comp isn't creating any increases in the share count.
然后争论总是这样的:嘿,如果你增长这么快,业务一切都运转得这么好,为什么你不把现金用于再投资业务,而是以100倍市盈率回购股票呢,对吧?基本上,你是在把钱投回那些可能真正有助于证明这种荒谬的100倍市盈率合理的项目上。
And and then the debate is always that, you know, hey, if you're growing so fast and everything's working so well with the business, why would you not put the cash toward reinvesting into the business rather than purchasing shares at 100 times earnings, right?
And so basically, you'd be pouring money back into projects that might actually help to justify that sort of ridiculous 100 times earnings multiple.
所以,这是它上市以来第一次,Shopify 的回购大致抵消了股权激励。所以即使50亿美元相对于一家2000亿美元的公司来说也不算多。但象征意义上,这是一家公司从烧钱的颠覆者阶段,跨入自我造血的复利机器阶段,对吧?
>> So for the first time in its public life, it is true that Shopify's buybacks are roughly offsetting stock based compensation. So even $5 billion is modest next to a $200 billion company.
But symbolically, this is a company that is, you know, crossing from the cash burning disruptor phase of its life into the self-funding compounder phase, right?
通常,这标志着市场对待该股票的方式发生了永久性变化。所以即使我并不一定喜欢以100倍市盈率把钱投入回购的想法,至少对我来说,这是一个好迹象,表明他们现在在考虑稀释股东权益时更加谨慎了。
当然,我们必须重复一点:他们现在花的这笔钱,本来可以投入业务,或者也许作为股息,比如派发给股东。
And usually, it marks a permanent change in how the market treats the stock. So even if I don't necessarily like the idea of putting money into buybacks at 100 times earnings, at least it's a good sign for me that they are more careful now thinking about diluting shareholders.
Even if of course, we have to repeat that the money they are spending right now, well, that's money that otherwise would have paid either into the business or maybe as a dividend to for example, paying out shareholders.
所以,我认为这就是我们的看法:如果一只股票的市盈率是100倍,你会怎么做?
So that's I think our opinion on, you know, what do you do with $5 billion if you trade it 100 times earnings.
现在,我们来谈谈最初那期节目里的估值。我当时并不觉得你的假设算得上保守,至少你第一次推荐这只股票时我是这么感觉的。但你当时说得很清楚,这只股票的定价已经反映了完美预期。
Now, let's talk a bit about the valuation in our original episode. So, I didn't think your assumptions came off as modest by any means. I would say at least that's what I felt back then when you pitched the stock for the first time.
But, you were pretty clear that the stock was priced for perfection.
在这个案例里,我甚至没法凭良心把能算出当前股价的数字放进我的模型里。这感觉实在太乐观了。也许如果我对电商有更深入的理解,就不会有这种感觉。我只是对那个领域没有太多洞察,更不足以让我放心地去为支撑 Shopify 当前股价所需的增长背书——这个股价也许可以通过对 Shopify 做反向 DCF 来推算市场大致预期。
In this case, I can't even in good conscience put numbers into my model that spit out the the current share price. It just feels too optimistic. And maybe it wouldn't feel that way if I had a deeper understanding of e-commerce.
I just don't have a ton of insight into that world and and certainly not enough to be comfortable underwriting the necessary growth to justify Shopify's current share price as is implied by maybe a reverse DCF that you might do on Shopify to look at what the market kind of expects.
所以,我建议我们先不要碰 Shopify,讽刺的是,推荐它的人正是我。但如果我们能拿到每股60美元以下的价格,那相比当前市场交易价就是相当大的折价了。对于像 Shopify 这样波动性大的公司来说,这样的抛售并非没有先例。
但必须出现类似的情况,比如30%甚至更多的抛售,也许甚至是40%的抛售,我才会真正认真地重新考虑把 Shopify 加入投资组合的决定。
So, I am recommending we hold off on Shopify, ironically as the person who's pitching it. But, if we get a price south of maybe $60 per share, which would be a considerable discount from where the market is currently trading.
It wouldn't be an unprecedented sell-off for companies with a stock as volatile as Shopify's. But, it would have to take something like that, like a 30% or more sell-off, maybe even a 40% sell-off, for me to really seriously revisit the decision to add Shopify to the portfolio.
事后看,我显然太保守了。但我认为,除了简单地说我对了还是错了,这里还有几个不同的点值得考虑。如果我们谈的是我们是否误解或低估了这门生意的质量,我主要会说没有。举个例子,我们谈过“创新者窘境”的动态会推动 Shopify 向高端市场和企业级市场发展。
这确实发生了,而且发生得比我们想的更快、规模更大。
Obviously, I was too conservative in hindsight. But, but I think there are a few different points to consider here beyond simply saying I was wrong or right. Uh if we're talking about whether we misunderstood or underappreciated the quality of the business, I I would mostly say no. And and so, for example, we we talked about the Innovator's Dilemma dynamic that would carry Shopify upmarket and enterprise.
And that very much has happened. And it's actually happened even faster in in a bigger way than we thought.
我们还说过 Shopify 的抽成率会随着时间推移逐步上升,到目前为止确实如此。我们还说过,它的护城河在于对转换成本的关注,加上其应用商店的网络效应。而他们的留存数据我认为最能说明这一切。
我们提到过,他们的留存率在92%到97%之间,具体取决于客户类型。所以在这方面,情况看起来相当不错。
And we also said Shopify's take rate would creep up over time, and so far it has. And And we said the moat was focus on switching costs, plus a network effect with their app store.
And their retention figures I think show this all best. We We mentioned that they are having, you know, 92% to 97% retention, depending on the customer. So, on that front, things things look pretty good.
我认为,一般来说,要弄清楚如果一切都完美实现,某样东西可能值多少钱,是极其困难的。所以通常你有两个引擎:盈利增长,而且它们实际上会大幅上升;然后市场对此感到兴奋,也推高估值倍数。
最终就会出现巨大的价格跳涨,尤其是在很短的时间内。我们常说,伟大的公司会给你带来向上的惊喜,Shopify 确实做到了。但如果你同时也想要安全边际,你就没法把这种惊喜建模进去,对吧?
这就是为什么我通常很不愿意在模型最后直接打一个20%的安全边际折扣。但即便如此,你在假设上仍然必须保守。如果你不用这些直接折扣,那就更得保守。
>> I think generally it's just incredibly difficult to figure out what something might be worth if everything works out perfectly. So, you know, usually you have this twin engine of, you know, earnings growth, and them going up meaningfully, actually.
And then the market getting excited about that, pushing up the multiple, too. And then you end up these massive price jumps, especially in a short amount of time. And we often say that, you know, great companies surprise you to the upside, and Shopify certainly did that.
But you can't model that when you also want to have a margin of safety, right? Which is why I'm generally quite hesitant to just, you know, put a flat 20% margin of safety discount at the end of my model.
But even then, you have to still be conservative in your assumptions. And actually, even more so if you don't use these, you know, flat-out discounts.
还有一件我在做任何投资决策复盘时都会问自己的事是:我们对数字的判断错了吗?在这方面,我认为你可以更清楚地指出我们当时建模的内容,然后说,是的,我们错了,对吧?我原以为 Shopify 正在转型为一家更成熟的公司,这意味着增长会减速。
但正如我们谈到的,增长实际上加速了。所以,即便只看2026年,我最终也低估了他们的收入,大概会差出约20亿美元。在这么短的时间内偏差这么大,确实让人谦卑。
>> And another thing I I would like to ask myself for any investment decision audit that I do is, were we wrong about the numbers? And And on that end of things, I think you can more clearly point to what we had modeled and and say, yes, we were, right?
I I thought Shopify was transforming into a more mature company, and that would mean that growth would decelerate. And Instead, as we talked about, growth has actually accelerated.
So, even just looking out to to 2026, I actually ended up underestimating their revenues by what will probably shake out to be about $2 billion. And being so far off in such a short period is it's humbling.
但因为我没做到,我就默认采取了保守做法,我仍然认为这是合理的做法,用来对冲自己的无知——当你并不总是知道自己不知道什么的时候。而且我们本来也不喜欢过度依赖模型。
But because I hadn't, I defaulted to conservatism and I still think that's the reasonable thing to do to hedge against your own ignorance when you don't always know what you don't know, and we don't like to put too much weight on our models anyways.
我认为普遍的智慧是:如果你需要一个复杂的模型,需要它来精确算出这只股票到底值多少钱,那很可能这个机会本身就没那么好。而如果你做完模型,它实际上意味着这家公司被严重高估了,那么更有可能的情况是,大多数时候你投资这家公司赚不到多少钱,或者拿不到好的回报。
>> You know, I think the the general idea or the wisdom is that if you need a complex model and you need it to, you know, figure out exactly what the stock's worth, probably the opportunity is just not that great.
And if you do your model and it actually means, you know, this company is highly overvalued, there's an even higher likelihood that most of the time you will not earn a lot of money or, you know, good return investing in that company.
如果我们回看一年前的一期节目,觉得我们现在对行业和公司的理解好多了,我也把这当作一个好迹象,对吧?我更感兴趣的是随着时间推移反思我们的决策过程。当我们认为自己作为投资者有所进化,并且更了解行业和公司时,我认为我们其实做好了本职工作。
(30:07) And if we look back at an episode from a year ago and feel like we have a much better understanding of the industry and the company now, I also take that as a good sign, right?
I mean, I'm more interested in, you know, reflecting on our decision-making process over time. And when we think we have evolved as investors and we know the industry and the company better, I think we made our job actually.
如果给自己一些肯定,我的意思是,2025年5月市场要求我们为 Shopify 支付超过100倍的滚动营业利润,而我们说那个价格已经包含了最乐观的未来情景,没有安全边际我们不会付这个价,我认为这相当合理,对吧?
>> If we give ourselves some credit, I mean, the market was asking us to pay more than 100 times trailing operating profits for Shopify in May of 2025, and we said that price embedded a best-case future, and and we wouldn't pay it without a margin of safety, and I think that was pretty reasonable, right?
我有自己的偏见,但我认为这个判断站得住脚。而且正如我们提到的,碰巧最乐观的情景真的出现了,实际发生的情况比我最佳情景模型里想象的还要好。所以,如果你拒绝为完美付费,而公司真的做到了完美,是的,你看起来就会是错的。
但作为投资者,从流程和生存、避免灾难性巨亏的角度来说,如果你买入每一只定价反映完美预期的股票,你不可能撑得久。
I have my own biases, but I think that stands up and as we mentioned it just so happened that the best case showed up you know, actually what happened was better than anything I imagined in my best case model.
And so if you refuse to to pay for perfection and then the company delivers it, yeah, you're going to look wrong. But as a matter of process and survival as an investor and avoiding catastrophic wipeouts, you can't expect to last long if you buy every stock that's priced for perfection.
所以,就你说的这点,给一家公司的历史业绩一些肯定是有道理的,就像 Shopify 的情况,但也许不能给太多肯定,就像 The Trade Desk 的情况。所以我不知道,这条线真的很难平衡。
And so to your point, I mean there's something to be said for giving a company credit for their track record as in Shopify's case, but maybe not too much credit as in the Trade Desk case.
And so I don't know, that's just a really fine line to to balance.
投资 Shopify 的机会并没有完全消失,这就是为什么我们今天聚在一起讨论这个机会。
it's not like the chance to invest in Shopify has completely disappeared, which is why we're meeting today discussing the opportunity.
Shopify 的 CFO 在这里做了一个有用的区分。他说:“今天发生的大部分事情更像是 LLM 驱动的发现。”也就是说,人们在聊天机器人里开始购物研究,而不是比如在 Google 里。
但完整版本——你给智能体一个预算,然后它主动替你买东西——由于 Meta 的 Muse,这看起来更近了,但还没有完全实现,我们也不知道至少在不久的将来会不会实现。
And Shopify's CFO makes a useful distinction here. So, he says, "Most of what's happening today is more like LLM-driven discovery." So, you know, people starting their shopping research inside the chatbot, you know, instead of, for example, Google, but the full version where you give the agent basically a budget and then it proactively buys things for you.
That seems closer now due to Meta's Muse, but it's not yet fully there and we don't know whether that will be the case in at least the near future.
而这正是 Shopify 商家实际销售的那类东西。所以,是特定的高考虑度产品。不管我们当时有没有意识到,我认为 Shopify 已经看到这一点有一段时间了,而且他们至少已经为此布局了两年。
然后在过去大约9个月里,他们推出了很多我称之为 AI 购物的基础管道。
And that's exactly the kind of stuff that Shopify merchants actually sell. So, it's specific high consideration products. whether we appreciated it or not, I think Shopify has has seen this for some time and they've been building for it for at least 2 years.
And then over about the last 9 months they they rolled out a lot of what I'll call maybe the basic plumbing for AI shopping
换句话说,它让每一家 Shopify 店铺都非常容易被 AI 助手理解,所以 Shopify 的 CEO 对此有一句很精辟的话:他说,其他所有人都得去抓取互联网上的商品数据,基本上就是派机器人去读网页,而 Shopify 本身就是这些数据的来源。
这一点越来越重要,因为由商品目录驱动的 AI 搜索转化为购买的概率,是依赖抓取网页的搜索的两倍。
so in other words it makes every Shopify store very easy for AI assistants to understand so Shopify CEO has a really good line about this everyone else he says has to scrape the internet for product data basically sending bots to read web pages while Shopify is the source of that data and so that matters more and more because AI searches powered by catalog turn into purchases twice as often as ones that rely on scraped web pages
如今你在 ChatGPT 里购物时,基本上就是在浏览 Shopify 的商品目录。而 Catalog 提供的是干净的商品数据,这是 AI 长期来看把天平倾向 Shopify 的一个绝佳例子。
and when you shop inside of chat GPT today what you're basically doing is you're browsing Shopify's catalog Catalog hands it clean product data instead, which is a great example of AI tilting things in Shopify's favor in the long term.
实际上,Shopify 和 Google 一起做了这件事,并在1月作为一项开放标准共同推出。基本上,它让代理式商务得以实现,同时 ChatGPT 或 Claude 不会从零售商和商家手中抢走客户关系。
actually Shopify and Google worked on this and and launched it together in January as an open standard. basically allows agentic commerce to happen without ChatGPT or Claude stealing the customer relationship from retailers and and merchants.
当然,Amazon 希望自己的购物代理流行起来,这意味着这些代理必须能在 Amazon 之外运作。因此,一个所有大型科技公司都认同的通用标准对此有帮助,不管这个标准是谁写的。在这个案例里,是它的主要竞争对手之一 Shopify。
of course, Amazon wants its own shopping agents to catch on, which means those agents need to be able to work outside of Amazon. And so, a common standard that all the big tech companies are aligned on, that helps with that, uh, no matter who wrote it. case, one of their chief rivals, Shopify.
Shopify 的特别之处在于,现在任何开发者都可以用 UCP 来开发并接入 Shopify 的商品目录,无需任何审批就能接触到 Shopify 的所有商家。所以,任何人开发的每一个新的 AI 购物应用,默认情况下基本上都成了 Shopify 商家又一个销售店面。
what is special for Shopify is that now any developer can build using the use CP and plug into Shopify's catalog, giving them access to all of Shopify's merchants with no approval needed.
So, every new AI shopping app anyone builds becomes basically another storefront for Shopify merchants to to sell through by default.
这也给了 Shopify 极大的可信度:连 Amazon 都认定,它无法承受忽视一项由 Shopify 和 Google 共同制定的标准。
And it gives Shopify a ton of credibility that even Amazon decided it couldn't afford to ignore a standard that Shopify and Google had both written.
早期的担忧是,Google 最终会来抢 Shopify 的支付业务,所以 Shopify 共同参与制定这项标准,正是为了不让这种情况发生。
the early fear was that Google would eventually come for Shopify's payments business, and so Shopify co-wrote this standard precisely so that wouldn't happen.
所以有意思的是,Shopify 声称它目前是唯一一个让商家可以直接在 ChatGPT、Copilot 和 Google 内销售的平台。而且你当然可以通过 Shopify 在一个地方管理这一切。
And so, it's interesting that Shopify claims that it's currently the only platform that lets merchants sell directly within Chat GPT, Copilot, and Google. (45:51) And then you can manage that all from one place, of course, through Shopify.
Shopify 声称,它目前是唯一一个让商家可以直接在 ChatGPT、Copilot 和 Google 内销售的平台。而且你当然可以通过 Shopify 在一个地方管理这一切。
所以我认为关键点是,这些聊天机器人并没有把 Shopify 排除在结账流程之外——我们说过,商家解决方案业务是 Shopify 最大的增长引擎,而支付处理是这台引擎中推动营收的最大部分。
所以支付处理这个角度对 Shopify 来说非常重要。基本上,聊天机器人负责与购物者对话,但 Shopify 仍然在幕后处理一切:处理订单、通过 Shopify Payments 收款,然后帮助发货。
Shopify claims that it's currently the only platform that lets merchants sell directly within Chat GPT, Copilot, and Google. And then you can manage that all from one place, of course, through Shopify.
So, I think the key point is that the chatbots don't cut Shopify out of the checkout process, where we talked about merchant solutions business is the biggest engine of growth for Shopify.
And then payment processing is the biggest part of that engine in terms of of driving revenue. So the payment processing angle is is really important for Shopify. And basically the the chatbot handles the conversation with the shopper, but Shopify still runs everything behind the scenes.
Processes the order, it takes the payment through Shopify payments, and then it helps get it shipped.
所以我认为关键点是,这些聊天机器人并没有把 Shopify 排除在结账流程之外——我们说过,商家解决方案业务是 Shopify 最大的增长引擎,而支付处理是这台引擎中推动营收的最大部分。
所以支付处理这个角度对 Shopify 来说非常重要。基本上,聊天机器人负责与购物者对话,但 Shopify 仍然在幕后处理一切:处理订单、通过 Shopify Payments 收款,然后帮助发货。
So, I think the key point is that the chatbots don't cut Shopify out of the checkout process, where we talked about merchant solutions business is the biggest engine of growth for Shopify.
And then payment processing is the biggest part of that engine in terms of of driving revenue. (46:17) So the payment processing angle is is really important for Shopify. And basically the the chatbot handles the conversation with the shopper, but Shopify still runs everything behind the scenes.
Processes the order, it takes the payment through Shopify payments, and then it helps get it shipped.
我从没想到会看到你对支付业务这么兴奋,但我得说,这有点让我想起 Mckay Liberman,电商加支付的飞轮效应极其强大。而且很明显,对 Shopify 来说最重要的是,你保住了抽成率。
所以在这个例子里,ChatGPT 可以说只是橱窗。
I would have never thought that I see you as excited about a payments business, but I got to say it kind of reminds me of Mckay Liberman, where the flywheel of having the e-commerce plus the payments is incredibly powerful.
And (46:43) obviously, and that's the most important thing to Shopify, you are keeping the take rate. So in this case, for example, ChatGPT is only the shop window, so to say.
这有点让我想起 Mckay Liberman,电商加支付的飞轮效应极其强大。而且很明显,对 Shopify 来说最重要的是,你保住了抽成率。所以在这个例子里,ChatGPT 可以说只是橱窗。
it kind of reminds me of Mckay Liberman, where the flywheel of having the e-commerce plus the payments is incredibly powerful. And obviously, and that's the most important thing to Shopify, you are keeping the take rate.
So in this case, for example, ChatGPT is only the shop window, so to say.
只要通过 ChatGPT 卖出的每一美元给 Shopify 带来的收入,和通过商家自己网站卖出的每一美元一样,那么 Shopify 在生成式商务时代就会过得很好,甚至可能蓬勃发展,因为也许我们的代理会推动更多消费。
so long as a dollar sold through ChatGPT pays Shopify the same as a dollar that goes through the merchant's own website, then Shopify is is going to do just fine in the age of a generative commerce and and maybe even thrive as perhaps our agents will drive more consumption.
尤其是看 Shopify 的数据,代理似乎已经变得越来越重要。具体说几个数字:自2025年1月以来,归因于 AI 搜索的 Shopify 店铺订单增长了约15倍。仅第二季度,AI 驱动的流量和归因于 AI 的订单都同比增长了两倍。
而且一半由 AI 引来的会话直接落在商品页面上,这基本上是传统搜索速率的两倍半。所以人们跳过了大量浏览环节。然后在我想是9月的一场高盛会议上,CFO 说,如果购物者是通过这些 AI 通道进来的,转化率大约高出80%。
when you look at especially Shopify's data, it looks like agents are becoming already more and more important. So putting some numbers on it, orders to Shopify stores attributed to AI search up roughly 15x since January of 2025.
And in Q2 alone, both AI-driven traffic and AI-attributed orders tripled year-over-year. And half of AI-referred sessions land directly on a product page. So that's basically where, you know, you have two and a half times the rate of traditional search.
So people are skipping a lot of the browsing. And then at a Goldman Sachs conference in I think it was September, the CFO said that shoppers convert roughly 80% better if they come through those AI rails, basically.
但如果你看总数,比如,有高达75%的归因于 AI 的购买来自前100大商品类别之外。仔细想想,这简直不可思议。
But then if you look at the total numbers, I mean for example, you have this crazy 75% of AI attributed purchases coming from outside of the top 100 product categories. (48:16) And that's insane if you think about it.
但 AI 代理是按具体意图来匹配的。比如在一次财报电话会上,Shopify 管理层讲了一个故事:一位家长在找一款给10岁孩子用的无屏手机,他们被引导到一家叫 Tin Can Phone 的小型 Shopify 商家,那几乎正是他们想要的,而如果他们用 Google 搜索,就永远找不到。
所以从某些方面说,AI 发现有利于这些长尾的小型专业商家,你猜怎么着?这恰恰就是 Shopify 的客户群。
But AI agents, they match on specific intent. So, on an earnings call, for example, Shopify's management told there was a story about a parent searching for a screenless phone for their 10-year-old kid.
They were being led to a small Shopify merchant called Tin Can Phone and it's pretty much exactly what they wanted and yet if they would have searched through Google, they would have never found it.
(49:05) So, in some ways AI discovery favors these long tail of small specialized merchants and guess what? That's exactly what, you know, Shopify's customer base is.
补充一下背景,他们说的 brand.com 指的是一个通用品牌,也就是公司自己的网站。所以听到这个词时,你就想成任何一家在 Shopify 上运营的独立店铺。但在常规 Google 搜索中,这些 brand.com、这些 Shopify 类网站的流量增长速度,大约是 Amazon、Wayfair、Chewy 和 Etsy 等大型市场平台流量的两倍。
And for context, they refer to just a kind of the generic brand, brand.com, is a company in their own website. So, think of any independent store running on on Shopify when you hear that.
But in regular Google search, traffic to those brand.com, those Shopify type sites, grew about two times faster than traffic to big marketplaces like Amazon, Wayfair, Chewy, and and Etsy.
这又是一个听起来不可思议的统计数据,但完全公平地说,这本来就是意料之中的,对吧?我的意思是,最好的 Shopify 品牌本来就该比 Amazon 增长得更快。
Which is another one of those stats that sound incredible, but to be completely fair, it is what you would expect, right? I mean, the best Shopify brands should be outgrowing Amazon.
但是,当他们把来自 AI 平台的流量汇总起来看时,这个品牌,也就是 brand.com,基本上以四到八倍的速度超过了传统电商平台。所以,Morton 说过,他在这个漏斗里看到的 brand.com 网站比以往任何时候都多。
而现在这一点已经体现在实测数据里了。正是这些数据促使他今年有信心上调该股票的评级。他说:“引用一句,G&V 的增长会比大多数人想象的时间更长、幅度更高。”
But, when they aggregated the traffic coming from AI platforms, this brand. (50:10) com was basically outpacing the legacy marketplaces by four to eight times. And and so, Morton has said he's seeing more brand.com sites in this funnel than ever before.
And and now it's showing up in in the measured data. And that data is what drove his conviction to upgrade the stock this year. And he said, "A quote, G&V is going to grow higher for longer than most people think. (50:35) "
嗯,肯定比我们去年以为的持续时间更长。但换句话说,如果讲得更简单一点,AI 聊天机器人正在给小型网店带来更多流量,而不是更少。
Well, definitely for longer than than we thought last year. But, I think in other words, if you just want to put it more simply, AI chatbots are driving more traffic to small online stores, and not less.
但是,这一点越是被证实,一个成功的 Etsy 卖家可能就会开始问:“既然我自己的 Shopify 店铺现在比以往任何时候都更有可能被 Google 的 AI 搜索或者 ChatGPT 推荐,而且成本基本上只是很小一部分,那我为什么还要付 25% 的费用来换取被找到的机会呢?”
But, the more that proves to be true, a successful Etsy seller might start asking, "Well, why am I paying 25% to be found when a Shopify store of my own now has a better chance than ever being recommended by Google's AI search or, you know, ChatGPT at basically a fraction of the cost?"
所以,brand.com 在 AI 推荐流量上跑赢 Amazon,这确实证明了 Shopify 在 Shopify catalog 中所构建的东西的重要性。
So, the fact that brand.com is outperforming Amazon on AI referrals is really a testament to the importance of what Shopify has built in in Shopify catalog.
这个想法是,从 Etsy 流失的商家,最终很可能会找到 Shopify 这条路。总之,Shopify 管理层到目前为止一直主张——而且我认同这一点——消除购买过程中的摩擦,并让每个人都相当于在口袋里拥有一个私人购物助手,会推动更多零售支出转向线上。
所以,我们会看到线上零售占全部零售商业的比例更高。而如果这一点哪怕只对了一部分,那么对 Amazon 和 Shopify 来说,整个蛋糕都会变大。
And and the idea is that merchants defecting from Etsy will most likely eventually find their way to Shopify. And anyways, Shopify management has argued to this point, and I buy it, that stripping out the friction from buying and giving everyone what amounts to a personal shopper in their pocket will push more retail spending online.
(53:34) So, we'll see a higher percentage of all retail commerce occurring online. And And if that's even partly right, then the whole pie gets bigger for both Amazon and Shopify.
看起来人人都这么做,但在这件事上,我确实认为 Shopify 的逻辑相当扎实。
It seems like everyone does that, but actually in this case, I do think the logic for Shopify is pretty solid.
让我担心的是,如果真到了紧要关头,Amazon 手里可能还藏着一些王牌,可以用来进一步打击 Shopify。其中之一我们已经看到了,就是 Buy with Prime 计划。
What scares me is that Amazon might have some aces up its sleeve that it could pull out to damage Shopify further if push really came to shove. And one of those, which we've already seen being the buy with Prime initiative.
我觉得,尽管 Buy with Prime 这波推进对 Shopify 来说看起来相当利空,尤其是在前智能体商务时代,但 AI 时代似乎确实打乱了旧的战线。
I feel like for as bearish as this buy with Prime push seemed to be for Shopify, especially in a in a pre-agentic commerce world, it does seem like the AI era has just scrambled the old battle lines.
所以,大家最终落脚的基础设施,又回到了 Shopify 与 Google 共同搭建的那些。而且,说来也巧——我在这里完全是猜测——就在那个消息宣布后的几周内,我们确实看到 OpenAI 搁置了它的即时结账实验,而 Shopify 商家从 2025 年秋季起就一直在接入这个实验。
And so, the rails everyone is ending up on are again the ones built by Shopify alongside Google. And And you know, coincidentally, and I'm I'm completely speculating here, but within a few weeks of that announcement, we did see OpenAI shelf its instant checkout experiment that Shopify merchants have been plugging into since the fall of 2025.
就在大约一年前,Amazon 和 Shopify 之间似乎还是非此即彼的对立,对吧?长期来看,似乎一方必须战胜另一方才能胜出。但随着 AI 不断进步并更深地融入我们的生活,这种描述确实越来越不像现实了。
And just a year or so, it seemed like there was a dichotomy between Amazon and Shopify, right? Long-term, one it seemed like would have to win at the expense of the other. But that really feels like a less accurate depiction of reality as AI improves and becomes more embedded in our lives.
我认为,现在更准确的思考方式是:电商这块蛋糕会变大,而且大概率会大幅变大。这对两家都有好处。不过,我们目前还不知道 LLM 和智能体会究竟如何改变我们的购物方式。所以,这还有待观察。
而这是否会偏向其中一方,是有可能的。有可能两家都赢,也有可能两家都把阵地输给某个今天甚至还不存在的竞争对手。
I think the more accurate way to think about it now is the e-commerce pie will grow and and probably grow by a lot. And that's good for both of them. And yet, we don't know at this point how LLMs and agents will change the way we shop exactly.
So, that remains to be seen. And And whether that will favor one or the other is is possible. (57:10) It's possible that both will win, or it's possible that both will will lose ground to some competitor that doesn't even exist today.
但另一方面,如果它最终真的成为一个推荐渠道,那它基本上就只是一个更好版本的 Google 搜索,让商家能够保留客户关系、结账环节和数据,因此也保留大部分议价筹码。
But then if it actually ends up being a referral channel on the other hand, it's basically just a better version of Google search that, you know, allows the merchant to keep the relationship and the checkout and the data and therefore also most of the takeaway leverage.
所以,我不知道,也许这就是为什么消息最初公布后,Shopify 的股价从大约 155 美元跌到了约 130 美元。然后 Amazon 又封禁了在其网站上购物相关的新闻。而就在第二天,Shopify 基本上宣布——我引用一下——“与 Muse 深度合作,在所有 Shopify 店铺通过 Shop Pay 实现智能体结账。”
然后市场把这当成了一个相当好的信号,我认为。它在接下来的两天里上涨了 14%。
So, I don't know, perhaps that's why Shopify's share slid from around 155 bucks to about 130 bucks after news was initially announced. (59:22) And then Amazon blocked news from shopping on its site.
While just the next day, Shopify basically announced, and I quote this, "partnering deeply with Muse to enable agentic checkout with Shop Pay on all Shopify stores." And then the stock took that as a pretty good sign, I think. It It rose 14% over the next 2 days.
但回到 Shopify 来说,显然,智能体销售似乎会完全按照 Shopify 商家任何其他线上店铺交易的经济结构来执行,因为 Shopify 店铺上的每一笔 Muse 购买都会通过 Shop Pay 完成。
But, just to to get back to to Shopify, apparently, it seems it agentic sales will carry the exact economics of any other online store transaction from a Shopify merchant because every Muse purchase on a Shopify store is going to run through Shop Pay.
所以,在 9 月,你找不到比 Shopify 和 Amazon 之间更鲜明的对比了。这确实是第一次有一个热门 AI 智能体找上 Amazon 的门,而 Amazon 把它拒之门外,而 Shopify 却刚刚加倍投入,并开放了它每一家店铺,真正与 Muse 打通。
So, in September, you couldn't have asked for a clear contrast between Shopify and Amazon. It really the first time a popular AI agent showed up at Amazon's door, Amazon turned them away, while Shopify has just doubled down on it and and opened every one of its stores to really be tied in with Muse.
而且实际上,我们甚至不知道 Amazon 和 Shopify 自己究竟是怎么想的,也不知道他们是否对五年后这应该是什么样子有愿景。
And actually, we don't even know how, you know, Amazon and Shopify actually think about it, if they have a vision for how this is supposed to look in 5 years' time.
Shopify 声称它自己抽成的那部分未来不会改变,但那笔费用总得有人来出。这一点我们是知道的。在一个由 AI 编写软件的世界里,商家会自己随手用 vibe coding 做出自己的 Shopify,然后就不再向作为中间商的 Shopify 交过路费了。
And Shopify claims its own cut will not change in the future, but that fee has to come from somewhere. We know that. in a world where AI writes the software, merchants will just vibe code their own Shopify and then uh stop paying tolls to Shopify as a middleman.
但我就是认为,市场在这个想法上已经走得太远了一步。我想你会发现,实际上没有人会试图用 vibe code 去实现像 Shopify 提供的那些服务这样的核心功能。我的意思是,与这样做的风险和挑战相比,节省的成本实在太微不足道了。
Uh but I just think that the market has taken things one step too far with that idea. I think you'll find that no one is actually trying to vibe code essential functions like the services that Shopify provides.
I mean, the savings are just so negligible compared to to the risks and and challenges of doing so.
我不知道,也许这话以后会站不住脚,但这就是我最怀疑的地方。而且我就是觉得,单干甚至真的省不了钱,因为你会错失 Shopify 的规模优势,对吧?
I don't know, maybe that won't age well, but I I I I just that's the thing I'm most skeptical about. And I just don't think going it alone uh would even really save money uh because you're missing out on Shopify's scale, right?
所以,以 Shopify 为例,它和 Stripe 之间的费率结构比任何单个商家能谈下来的都要好。而当你脱离平台自己去 vibe code 某个东西时,你就失去了这一点。
So, Shopify, for example, has a better fee structure with Stripe than any individual merchant could ever negotiate. And so you lose that when you go off on your own to vibe code something.
而且 Shopify 商家可以一键连接 Meta 的广告追踪工具。这个集成之所以存在,是因为 Shopify 的 CEO 和 Mark Zuckerberg 亲自一起促成了这笔交易。
And Shopify merchants get a one-click connection to Meta's ad tracking tools. And that's an integration that exists now because literally the CEO of Shopify and Mark Zuckerberg personally worked on that deal together.
我完全可以理解,Shopify 在软件之外提供的价值足够多,基本上不会被任何人用 vibe code 取代掉。
I could definitely see how how Shopify offers enough value basically outside of the software to not be vibe coded away by anyone.
正如你所说,在物流、广告以及所有这些基本上属于幕后、必须由这样一个平台来完成的工作之间,几乎无法想象有人能用 vibe code 做出其中任何一部分。
And as you said, you know, between logistics, the advertising and all that basically you know, behind the curtain work that has to be done by such a platform. It's almost impossible to imagine that anyone could vibe code any of this.
这可能会在很久以后限制它们的定价能力,但肯定有一些企业比 Shopify 更让我担心。我们一直在谈论 Michael Moritz,也把他包括进来,因为我认为他对 Shopify 的思考非常清晰。
所以基本上,他主张,即使拥有无限的资源、一支工程师大军和 Anthropic 开出的空白支票,你也不可能重建它并做到比直接付费使用 Shopify、享受随之而来的所有好处更便宜——甚至能拿到与 Stripe 的批量折扣。
And it might limit their pricing power way down the line, but there are definitely businesses I'm a lot more concerned about than Shopify. We keep on talking about Michael Moritz and including him because I think he he thinks very clearly about Shopify.
And so basically he has argued that even with unlimited resources, an army of engineers, and a blank check from Anthropic, you could not rebuild it to be cheaper than just paying to use Shopify and enjoying all the benefits that come with that to to the point of getting volume discounts with with Stripe.
如果你是一个商家,在 TikTok、Etsy、Amazon 以及自己的网站上销售。然后你用 vibe code 搭了一套替代 Shopify 的技术栈,结果在黑色星期五遇到了故障。
那你就只能靠自己了,你的生意火烧眉毛,而你为了省几个小钱,搬起石头砸了自己的脚。
If you're a merchant who's selling on TikTok and Etsy and Amazon and also your own website. And then you've, you know, vibe coded this alternative stack to Shopify, and you run into a glitch on Black Friday.
Well, you're on your own, and your business is on fire, and you shot yourself in the foot just to save a few pennies.
你对 AI 故事的另一半怎么看?就是那种基本理念是 AI 来经营商家业务的方向。所以,我想这指的是 Shopify 的 Sidekick 产品,如果你愿意这么叫的话,它旨在成为一个直接内置于 Shopify 的 AI 商业伙伴。
所以,它了解你的产品、你的客户、你的全部交易历史,而且它实际上还能在你的店铺里进行构建。所以,它会编辑你的产品照片、分析你的数据,并创建自定义应用。
what's your take on the other half of the AI story? You know, where the idea is basically that AI runs the merchant's business. So, this is Shopify's, I think, Sidekick product, if you want to call it that way, which is meant to be like an AI business partner built right into Shopify.
So, it knows your products, it knows your customers, your entire transaction history, and it can also actually build within your store. So, it edits your product photos, it analyzes your data, and it creates custom apps.
我觉得这听起来相当不错,使用情况似乎也相当强劲。我认为使用 Sidekick 的日活跃商家同比增长了 3.5 倍。每日会话数增长了近 5 倍,仅今年第二季度我们就有了近 3400 万次对话。
然后,仅仅一年内,商家通过它构建了 36000 个自定义应用。所以,这基本上是上一季度的三倍。
I I think it sounds pretty good, and usage seems to be pretty strong. I think daily active merchants using Sidekick is up three and a half times year-over-year. Daily sessions is up almost five times, and we have nearly 34 million conversations just in Q2 of this year.
And then you have 36,000 custom apps built by merchants through it in just a single year. So, that's basically triple to the prior quarter.
所以,再次说,这些数字看起来疯狂,但你对它的长期看法是什么?我的意思是,这简直太疯狂了。我的意思是,对于任何在 ChatGPT 发布四年后环顾四周、想知道 AI 将如何真正影响整个经济生产率的人来说,我认为这是一个绝佳的例子。
So, again, the numbers look insane, but what's your take on it in the long term? I mean, it's just nuts. I mean, for anyone looking around wondering how AI will actually impact productivity across the economy four years after the release of ChatGPT, I think that's a heck of an example.
我还读到,在 Sidekick 的帮助下,现在由 Shopify 提供支持的新店铺中,有近 10% 在注册后一天内就完成了第一笔销售。所以,这个比例在短短三年内上升了 43%。
And I've also read that with the help of Sidekick, nearly 10% of new shops powered by Shopify now make their first sale within a single day of signing up. And so, that share is up 43% in in just three years.
教皇当选时,教皇 T 恤在一小时内就开卖了。所以,Shopify 称之为“以文化速度进行的商业”。而且每次开店变得更容易,Shopify 的商家漏斗就变得越来越宽。
And when the Pope was elected, the Pope t-shirts were on sale within an hour. And so, Shopify calls it commerce at the speed of culture. And And every time it gets easier to start, Shopify's funnel of merchants just gets wider and and wider.
作为密切关注这家公司的人,我希望你拿到了其中一件 T 恤。我觉得他没拿到,否则我会看到的,但这真是可惜。我得说,我对此的感受可能比你更复杂一些,因为 Shopify 的总裁称他们可能是世界上对 AI 最狂热投入的公司,意思是他们在内部使用 AI 方面已经全力以赴。
As someone who follows the company quite quite closely, I hope you got one of those t-shirts. I don't think he did because otherwise I would have seen it, but but it's a shame.
I got to say that and I probably feel a bit more mixed about it than than you, but just because Shopify's president has called them probably the most AI-pilled company in the world, meaning they've gone all in using AI internally.
每当你这样做,尤其是在这种时候,然后你拿出这些令人难以置信的成果,在我看来,即使它们运作得相当好,他们也可能稍微过度吹嘘了。
And whenever you do that, especially at these times, and you come out with these incredible and almost to me it's seems like, you know, even if they're working quite well, they might oversell it just slightly.
不过值得称赞的是,员工人数两年来大致持平,而收入增长了 60% 以上。我无法说这是否完全归功于 AI,但你知道,这个公式正是运营费用能够从 2024 年第二季度的 42% 降至上一季度的 34% 的原因。所以,这是一个非常重大的影响。
To their credit though, I mean, headcount has been roughly flat for 2 years while revenue was growing 60-plus percent. And I can't say whether that's all thanks to AI, but you know, that formula is how operating expenses have been able to fall from 42% in Q2 of 2024 to 34% last quarter. So, that's a major major impact.
情况就是这样,我认为这很合理,因为由此可以说,AI 已经在收入和利润率上大规模显现出来,可能比我们迄今看过的任何其他公司都更明显。
And that's the case, and I think it's fair because of that that you can make a case that AI is already showing up in a big way for revenues and margins, probably more than with any other company we've yet looked at.
但显然这不是免费的,对吧?我确信 Shopify 的 AI 算力账单简直高得离谱。所以 Shopify 的 CEO 实际上已经承认,Sidekick 的大量使用带来的 AI 算力成本上升,正在对毛利率造成一定压力。
But obviously that doesn't come for free, right? I'm sure Shopify's AI compute bills are just like completely crazy. And so Shopify's CEO has has actually acknowledged that rising AI compute costs from all that Sidekick usage are putting some pressure on on gross margins.
我指的是 Adobe,但我认为这个逻辑很可能也适用于 Shopify。可能是这样,不过我得说,如果你有 Shopify 那样的增长,我认为市场很可能会给你比 Adobe 过去几年得到的更多认可。
And so I'm referring to Adobe but I think that logic probably applies to Shopify as well. It might be although I got to say you know if you have the growth of Shopify I assume that the market will likely give you a bit more credit than Adobe has gotten in in the last couple of years
我们不妨进入估值部分,基本上就是18个月前你第一次看这家公司时,导致我们没有投资这家大概是我们节目上看过的质量最高的公司之一的原因。那么你今天怎么看,Shopify 这家公司值多少钱?
and you know how about we get to the valuation section basically the part that 18 months ago when you first looked at the company was the reason why we did not invest in you know one of the probably highest quality companies that we looked at here for the show.
So what do you think today the company Shopify is worth?
所以,你可以想象,我对我的模型做了一些更新,模型会链接在下面的节目笔记里,想看的人可以去看。但除了上调未来几年的收入预测——我之前确实低估了——最大的变化是把营业利润率设定为在未来5年升至接近20%,高于今年的14%。
So yeah as you can imagine I had some updates to make to my model and we'll have that model linked to in the show notes below for anyone who wants to see it but besides revising higher their revenue over the next few years where I was really underestimating things the biggest change was setting their operating margins to increase to nearly 20% in the next 5 years up from 14% this year.
利润率的这个跃升使营业利润能够比收入增长得更快,这对股东来说会是件好事。我还调整了模型,以反映我们之前谈到的:Shopify 已经从大幅稀释现有股东,变成了凭借回购能够保持股份数量持平。
So that jump in margins enables operating profits to actually grow faster than revenues and that would be a wonderful thing for for shareholders and I also adjusted my model to reflect that Shopify we talked about this earlier has gone from being a massive net diluter of existing shareholders to you know thanks to buybacks being able to keep their share count flat.
那你怎么看这个双引擎,也就是盈利增长加上估值倍数?你现在给这家公司多少倍估值?
And what do we think about the the twin engine so earnings growth at the multiple? What's the multiple that you're now putting on the business?
这是个好问题,这次我决定借用本·格雷厄姆的智慧,他有一个市盈率矩阵,你看 AAA 级公司债券的利率,也就是市场上质量最高的公司债券,然后是你对公司未来几年盈利的估计增长率,然后它给出一个你应该愿意为这只股票支付的价格倍数。
这是个有用的启发式方法,如果我们遵循这个非常简单的框架,那么对于像 Shopify 这样增长的公司,大约35倍营业利润可能是合理的价格。
It's a good question and I decided this time to invoke the knowledge of none other than Ben Graham and basically he has a a price to earnings matrix where you look at the interest rate on triple A rated corporate bonds.
So, the the the highest quality corporate bonds out there and then your estimated growth rate for the company's earnings over the next couple years and then it spits out a multiple that you should be willing to pay for the stock and it's a it's a helpful heuristic and if we follow this very simple framework, then something like 35 times operating earnings is is probably a fair price to pay for a company growing like Shopify is.
不过,我承认这与市场历史上对 Shopify 的估值相比相当保守。所以,为了讨论,也许我们可以更慷慨一些,因为正如我们今天所发现的,Shopify 是如此特别的一家公司,但即使按每股营业利润45倍来算,我得到的估值数字看起来也不太好。
Though, I I recognize that this is pretty conservative compared to how the market has historically valued Shopify. So, for the sake of argument, maybe we'd be more generous because, you know, Shopify is such a special company as we've found out today and even at 45 times operating profits per share though, the valuation number that I get just doesn't look great.
不幸的是,我们遇到了和去年一样的问题,当时我们第一次看这只股票时,它的交易价格是,你猜怎么着,112倍营业利润。这个数字说出来都离谱。它违背了价值投资者的常识,而今天它的交易价格正好是112倍营业利润。
Unfortunately, we have the same problem that we did last year and at the time we first looked at the stock, it was trading at, guess what, 112 times operating profits. It's just an obscene number to even say.
It violates the senses of a of value investors and and well, today it trades at exactly 112 times operating profits.
所以,>> [笑声] >> 我就算想编也编不出这种事,而且正如我所说,Shopify 根本没有增长到与其估值倍数相匹配的程度。股价翻倍是因为盈利大致翻倍,而市场一路上一直支付同样的溢价。
So, >> [laughter] >> I I couldn't have made that up myself even if I wanted to and and as I say, Shopify has not grown into its multiple at all. The stock doubled because the earnings roughly doubled and the market just kept paying the same premium the whole way.
所以,今天买入股票的人实际上是在做一个我们当初放弃了的同样的赌注,只是起点更高,并且同样需要公司未来做到完美。
So, really anyone buying shares today is making the same bet that we passed on just from a higher starting point and the same need for perfection from the company going forward.
Shopify 去年确实交出了成绩,但112倍营业利润意味着你不仅预期它延续去年的表现,你实际上预期它越来越好。
Shopify definitely delivered over the last year, but 112 times operating earnings means that you do not only expect it to continue the way it has in the last year. You actually expect it to get better and better.
在这里,我认为还需要再过几年,等市场终于说:“好吧,我们谨慎一点,实际回落到比如35到45倍盈利。”我认为如果本·格雷厄姆会建议35倍盈利,而我们采用45倍,我觉得这已经是我们能接受的极限了。
Here, I think it will take us another couple of years in a market that finally says, "Okay, well, let's be a bit more cautious here and actually settle down to let's say 35 45 times earnings."
And I think if Ben Graham would suggest 35 times earnings, and we go with 45, I I think that's as far as we can go.
我想我不知道本·格雷厄姆是否曾经为任何公司支付过35倍盈利,但即使 Shopify 是一家出色的企业,支付112倍营业利润还是让我感觉不太好。
I think I don't know if Ben Graham would have ever paid 35 times earnings for any company, um but I don't feel too good even though Shopify's a fantastic business for paying 112 times operating earnings.
是的,我当然不想押注 Shopify 基本上能持续完美运营。所以,我不知道,也许我们终究什么都没学到,因为我们的结论是一样的。也许归根结底,我们只是太吝啬的价值投资者,不愿为这家公司支付高价,尽管我们现在基本上用了两整期播客主要谈论它有多好。
Yeah, I certainly wouldn't want to bet on Shopify basically continuing to operate perfectly. And and so, I don't know, maybe we haven't learned anything after all cuz we're at the same conclusion.
Uh I Maybe at the end of the day we're just too stingy of value investors to pay up for this company, despite us now basically devoting two full podcasts to primarily talking about how great it is.
而这一次,我要怪价值投资之父。对,就是本·格雷厄姆。他成了我的挡箭牌。我实在没法为支付接近他所建议倍数两倍、甚至三倍的估值找到理由。所以,我就是靠不持有这家公司来让自己晚上睡得着觉。
And and this time uh I'm going to blame the father of value investing. Yeah, Ben Graham. And he's my cop out. I I I can't justify paying nearly twice the multiple uh he would recommend or really triple the multiple he would recommend.
Uh so, that's how I I'm going to sleep at night by not owning this company.
但这确实是我们需要密切关注的一个。所以,我肯定,我说这家公司大概在每股100美元左右算是估值合理,会显得我很糟糕。他们在过去一年里大幅提升了内在价值,但录制时股价是每股160美元。
Um but it really is one that we need to be watching closely. And so, I'm sure I'll look terrible by saying that the company is is probably about fairly valued at maybe $100 a share.
Uh so, they have increased their intrinsic value dramatically in the last year, but shares are trading at $160 per share at the time of recording.
我希望在某个时候能出现足够大的抛售,让我们可以大量买入一批股票。如果股价接近100美元,我肯定会愿意开一个跟踪仓位。
At some point, I'm hoping we'll get a big enough sell-off so we can gobble up a a bunch of shares. And if it gets close to $100, I would definitely be open to to opening a a tracking position.
我认为,我们花了很长时间去梳理自己错得有多离谱,我们低估了Shopify。这听起来像是在重复同样的错误,但说实话,我其实并不完全认同我们一开始就错了这个说法。
Well, I think we, you know, spend such a long time working out how wrong we've been and you know that we underestimated Shopify. And this sounds like repeating the same mistake, but if I'm being completely honest, I don't fully agree with the notion that we were wrong anyway in the first place.
这并不是因为我不喜欢回顾过去的投资决策、把它们当作错误。我们确实这么做了。我们有一整期节目专门讲我们在过去一年半里犯的错误。但我们不必去追逐那些持续把最乐观情景计入价格的股票。
And it's not because I don't like, you know, considering past investment decisions a mistake. We definitely did that. We had an entire episode devoted simply to the mistakes that we committed in, you know, the last year and a half.
But we don't have to chase stocks that price in these best-case scenarios continuously.
我们了解市场的运作方式,在某个时候,我很有信心我们会得到一个机会,以对我们两人来说更有吸引力的价格买入Shopify。
We know how the markets work and at some point I'm pretty confident we will get a chance to buy Shopify at a price that seems more attractive to the two of us.
尤其是在整个市场都试图弄清楚AI和智能体将对电子商务产生什么影响的时候,从长期来看更是如此。我不知道。一个月后,Shopify成了AI的大输家,下个月又成了AI的大赢家。所以我很有信心,未来我们会有机会以明显更好的价格买入它们。
And especially at times where the whole market tries to figure out what impact AI and agents will have on e-commerce in general and, you know, in the long run. (1:15:22) And you know, I don't know.
One month from now they're on Shopify are, you know, the big AI losers and then the next month they are the big winners of AI. So I'm pretty confident we will have the chance to buy them at, you know, significantly better prices in the future.
投资中最难的问题不是找到伟大的公司。Shopify从来都不难被识别为伟大。难的是市场通常也知道这一点。你通常不得不支付一个不留任何容错空间的价格。
The hardest problem in investing is not finding great companies. Shopify was never hard to identify as great. The hard part is that the market usually knows it, too. And you usually have to pay a price that leaves no room for error.
所以在某些时期,错误从未出现,价格持续走高。但我们的工作就是坚持在场、保持诚实,并准备好迎接市场先生终于对公司的某些举动做出糟糕反应的那一天。
And so over some periods, the error never comes and and the price keeps working. But our job is just to keep showing up and saying honest and and be ready for those days when Mr. Market finally has a a bad reaction to something that the company has done.
所以一年半以来,我们对Shopify的谨慎和犯错可以说是无法区分的。而且这种情况可能还会持续,因为这家公司的执行力和地球上任何企业一样出色。
And so for a year and a half our caution on Shopify has been indistinguishable from being wrong, I would say. And it may stay that way because this company is executing as well as any business on the planet.
但马克斯也警告所有按今天价格买入的人:对一家公司判断正确但过早,或者在任何价格上判断正确,都可能让人感觉像是在很长很长时间里都错了。所以我们宁愿等待我们认为更接近一家伟大公司公允价格的机会——它就在我们的观察名单上——而不是为完美买单。
But Marks is also warning everyone paying today's price that being right about a company too early or at any price can feel exactly like being wrong for a long, long time. And so, we would rather wait for what we think is is something closer to a fair price for a great company on our watch list than pay for perfection.
支付对许多小企业来说是个棘手的问题,至少过去是这样。而Shopify让这个过程对他们来说容易多了。再提一下,因为每当我们谈论软件公司,尤其是像企业软件这样无聊的东西时,如果你自己从未使用过这些服务,一切都会感觉有点抽象,而我就没用过。
简而言之,Shopify是一个为任何人在任何地方销售任何东西而设计的平台,它让创业者获得了多年来只有大公司才能真正拥有的资源。
Payments is a thorny issue for many small businesses, or at least it used to be. And Shopify has made the process so much easier for them. And just to hit on it again, cuz whenever we talk about software companies, especially something as boring as enterprise software, it can all feel a bit abstract if you've never used the services yourself, which I haven't.
(1:19:00) But in short, Shopify is a platform designed for anyone who sell anything, anywhere, giving entrepreneurs the resources that for many years were only really reserved for larger corporations.
自2015年IPO以来,Shopify通过将商品交易总额收入增长超过50倍,展示了其平台的强大能力。
And since IPO'ing in 2015, Shopify has shown just how powerful its platform is by growing gross merchandise volume revenue by over 50X.
这个频道对 $SHOP 的历次判断
The Intrinsic Value Podcast 在这只股票上共 3 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。