$SPGI · Everything Money · 2026-11-02
SPGI的评级/指数护城河和高利润率很强,但增长缓慢、资本回报在下滑,AI数据定价是风险;在453美元,十年模型给出的335美元均值意味着平均回报5.5%、最低1.2%、最佳9.6%,低于9.5%的市场门槛,因此相较标普500 ETF并不具吸引力。
逐段跳播
首先,是一只分析师建议买入的股票。S&P Global。你可能没听过这个名字,但你一定知道它的作品。它就是著名的 S&P 500 指数背后的公司,也是全球最大的信用评级和金融数据提供商之一。
First, a stock that analysts recommend buying. S&P Global. You may not know the name, but you certainly know her work. It is the company behind the famous S&P 500 index, and one of the world's largest providers of credit ratings and financial data.
它的股价今年下跌了约 8%,部分原因是它剥离了其中一项业务,并把股份卖给了新的所有者。因此,公司的真实表现比这个数字单独显示的更好。
Its stock has fallen by about 8% this year, partly due to it spinning off one of its businesses and selling its shares to its new owners. Therefore, the company's true performance is better than this number alone suggests.
这就是今天的 S&P Global。S&P Global 拥有非常强的竞争优势。当一家公司想通过发行债券借钱时,它往往需要信用评级,而 Standard & Poor's 是少数几个提供这些评级的可信名字之一。
Here's S&P Global today. S&P Global has a very strong competitive advantage. When a company wants to borrow money by issuing bonds, it often needs a credit rating, and Standard & Poor's is one of the few trusted names that provide these ratings.
此外,每当有投资产品基于 Standard & Poor's 500 指数构建时,Standard & Poor's 都会收取一笔名义费用,而有数万亿美元资金绑定在这个指数上,Standard & Poor's 就成了一个隐藏的收费关口,无论市场走向哪里,都能从整个市场收取费用。
Furthermore, Standard & Poor's receives a nominal fee each time an investment product is constructed based on the Standard & Poor's 500 index, and with trillions of dollars tied up in this index, Standard & Poor's becomes a hidden gateway for collecting fees from the entire market, wherever it goes.
这是一个高利润且可复制的商业模式。事实上,它实际上是四种商业模式合而为一:信用评级、金融数据与分析、股票市场指数,以及能源与大宗商品信息。因此,它同时从金融世界的各个领域获取利润。
It is a highly profitable and replicable business model. In fact, it is really four business models in one: credit ratings, financial data and analytics, stock market indices, and energy and commodities information.
Therefore, it generates profits from various sectors of the financial world simultaneously.
一旦一家银行或投资者在日常运营中依赖 Standard & Poor's 的数据,切换到另一个来源就会变得极其困难。
Once a bank or investor relies on Standard & Poor's data in their day-to-day operations, switching to another source becomes extremely difficult.
现在,有一点很多人忽视了:这样的商业模式不需要大量资本就能增长;它不需要工厂或仓库。它只是数据、人员和一个可信的名字。因此,由于运营所需的资本很少,它赚到的很大一部分最终可以回报给所有者。
Now, here's something many people overlook: a business model like this doesn't need a lot of capital to grow; it doesn't need factories or warehouses. It's just data, people, and a trusted name.
Therefore, a large portion of what it earns can ultimately return to its owners due to the low capital required to operate it.
那么,负面观点是什么呢?它在信用评级领域的业务受到企业债务规模的影响。因此,高利率会显著拖慢它的增长。
Now, what is the negative viewpoint? Well, its activity in the field of credit rating is affected by the size of corporate debt. Therefore, high interest rates can significantly slow its growth.
随着时间推移,价格更低的AI驱动型数据提供商的出现,可能会削弱它的定价能力。不过,要替换一家值得信赖的信用评级机构,金融界并不会急于这么做。
Over time, the emergence of AI-powered data providers at lower prices may reduce its ability to set prices. However, replacing a trusted credit rating agency is not something the financial world is rushing into.
那么,我们来分析一下这些数字,看看分析师们说得对不对。记住,各位,说到一家公司的价格,我不看交易所里的股价,我看的是市值。这家公司的价格是1340亿美元。这个金额足以买下整个市场上的所有股票。
So, let's analyze the numbers and see if the analysts are right. Remember, guys, when it comes to the price of a company, I don't look at the stock price on the stock exchange, I look at the market capitalization.
The price of this company is $134 billion. This amount is enough to buy all the shares in the entire market.
接下来看这家企业的价值。市值是1340亿美元,企业价值是1560亿美元。这220亿美元的差额就是它们的净债务。这看起来可能是一笔很大的金额,但我们需要把它和现金流作比较。去年的现金流是55亿美元,而五年平均值是40亿美元。
所以情况还不算太糟。这家公司目前的售价大约是其去年自由现金流的四倍。这包括了所有债务,包括用现金偿还债务的部分。所以,看起来它们能够合理地承担这笔债务。
Next, look at the value of the organization. So, the market capitalization is $134 billion, and the value of the enterprise is $156 billion. This difference of $22 billion represents their net debt.
It may seem like a large amount, but we need to compare it to the cash flow. Last year's cash flow was $5.5 billion, while the five-year average was $4 billion. So, the situation isn't too bad.
The company is selling for about four times its free cash flow for last year. This includes all debts, including the use of cash to repay them. So, it seems they can reasonably afford this debt.
在本节的后面,我们会看到它们的长期债务与现金流的对比。接下来我们看资本回报率。五年期的回报率是15%,而一年期只有8%。这就引出了一个问题:为什么它会这样下降?这取决于营业收入,所以它们的营业收入可能下降了。
Later in this section, we will see a comparison between their long-term debt and their cash flow. Next, we move on to return on capital. The return over five years is 15%, while it is only 8% over one year.
This raises the question: why is it decreasing in this way? This depends on operating income, so their operating income may have decreased.
最后,这家公司目前的售价大约是其自由现金流的24倍、盈利的27倍。所以,它们去年的自由现金流以及过去五年的自由现金流都高于净利润,这让我很高兴。这种情况很罕见。不过,24倍和27倍这两个比率看起来有点高。
这并不意味着股价被高估了。记住,只靠一个数字或一个指标,不足以判断一只股票的质量。如果这家公司能在数年内每年把现金流提高30%或40%,那么股价就是低的。但这正是我们需要回答的问题。
Finally, the company is sold for approximately 24 times its free cash flow and 27 times its earnings. So, their free cash flow last year and over the past five years has been higher than their net income, which pleases me.
It is a rare occurrence. However, the ratios of 24 and 27 seem a bit high. This does not mean that the stock price is overpriced. Remember, relying on just one number or one indicator is not enough to judge the quality of a stock.
If this company can increase its cash flow by 30 or 40% annually for several years, the share price will be low. But that is the question we need to answer.
至于利润,年利润率大约是30.5%。十年期的利润率是29.5%,五年期是28%。所以,这个比率看起来稳定在接近30%的水平。这让我很高兴,但真正让我印象深刻的是高达71%的毛利率。
As for profit, the annual profit margin is approximately 30.5%. The profit margin for ten years is 29.5%, and for five years it is 28%. Therefore, the ratio appears to be stable in the late twenties.
This pleases me, but what really impresses me is the high gross profit margin of 71%.
现在,让我困惑的是接下来这一点。这么高的毛利意味着,每增加一美元收入,都会有相当大的一部分转化为利润。但是,数字这么高,为什么随着收入持续增长,利润率却没有继续上升呢?因为它们的收入增长非常平稳。非常稳定。所以,我对这一切有点困惑。
Now, what puzzles me is what comes next. This high gross profit means that every additional dollar of revenue will have a significant portion converted into profit. But, with such a high figure, why doesn't the profit margin continue to rise as revenues continue to grow?
Because their revenues are rising very steadily. Very consistently. So, I'm a little confused about all this.
对于喜欢股息的人来说,它把大约0.9%的利润用于分红,这只消耗了它们10亿美元的现金流。我们社区的成员建议现在就买入这家公司的股票。
For those who like dividends, it distributes about 0.9% of profits, which consumes only $1 billion of their cash flow. Members of our community recommend buying shares of this company right now.
我们来看看八大支柱。好,这就是八大支柱。五年自由现金流这一项上我们打了一个叉,这个我们已经讨论过了,但其他各项都是正确的。它们在这里回购股票。记住,回购大家喜欢的股票,如果它们支付的是虚高的价格,那未必是好事。
这是很多人在股票回购问题上会忽略的一点。只有当股票被低估时,回购才是好事。
Let's take a look at the eight pillars. Okay, here are the eight pillars. We have an X mark at the five-year free cash flow figure, which we discussed, but everything else is correct.
They are buying back shares here. Remember, buying back shares that people like doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing if they're paying an inflated price. This is something many people overlook when it comes to share buybacks. It is only good if the stocks are undervalued.
现在我们来看看分析师对这家公司的看法。分析师目前预计今年每股收益约为18美元,并在未来四年增长到27美元。所以,整体上是良好的两位数增长。
Now let's see what the analysts think about this company. Analysts currently expect earnings per share this year to be around $18, and to grow to $27 over the next four years. So, there is good double-digit growth overall.
至于收入,它们大体上稳定,但增长缓慢。今年下降了3%,然后是5%、7%、5.5%和5.3%。正如我们之前提到的,利率在上升。因此,如果企业借债减少,它们的业务量就会下降。如果你认为股市被高估了,未来三四年市场大幅下跌可能会对收入产生负面影响。
As for revenues, they are largely stable, but slow. It has decreased by 3% this year, 5%, 7%, 5.5%, and 5.3%. As we mentioned earlier, interest rates are rising. Therefore, if companies borrow less, their business volume will decrease.
If you believe the stock market is overvalued, a sharp market decline over the next three or four years could negatively impact revenues.
事实上,为了说明这一点,让我们回到互联网公司(dot-coms)的时代,也就是1996、1997、1998、1999、2000、2001那几年。看看它们的收入是如何飙升的,仅仅四年就增长了40%以上,然后经历了一段短暂的停滞期。增长不再那么快,但仍在继续。
In fact, to illustrate the point, let's go back to the era of internet companies (dot-coms) in the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001. Look how their revenues skyrocketed, by more than 40% in just four years, and then experienced a brief period of stagnation.
The growth wasn't as rapid, but it was still ongoing.
所以,我们掌握了一些信息和数字。我们现在的任务是对这家公司做出假设,然后在不看资产负债表的情况下确定合适的买入价格。
So, we have some information and figures. Our task now is to make assumptions about the company, and then determine the appropriate price to pay without looking at the balance sheet.
在这里,我对S&P Global指数做了一项十年期分析。首先,我假设收入每年增长3%、5%和7%。这些都不是很大的百分比。其次,我在这里将重点关注自由现金流,同时保持固定的利润率。
我喜欢高自由现金流。因此,我把利润率和自由现金流设定为30%、32%和34%。
Here I have conducted a ten-year analysis of the S&P Global Index. First, I assumed revenue growth of 3%, 5% and 7% annually. These are not large percentages. Secondly, I will focus here on free cash flow, while maintaining a fixed profit margin.
I like the high free cash flow. Therefore, I set a profit margin and free cash flow of 30%, 32% and 34%.
下一个问题是,十年后我会给这家公司分配什么样的市盈率(P/E)和市自由现金流比率?嗯,有几个问题需要问。它们有显著的增长潜力吗?并没有。它们有可持续的竞争优势吗?我会说它们有一个非常巨大且可持续的竞争优势。
标普500指数,以及总体上的S&P Global指数,就是一个巨大的可持续竞争优势。
The next question is, what is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and the price-to-free cash flow ratio that I would allocate to this company after 10 years? Well, there are some questions that need to be asked.
Do they have significant growth potential? not really. Do they have a sustainable competitive advantage? I would say they have a very large, sustainable competitive advantage. The S&P 500 index, and the S&P Global index in general, is a great sustainable competitive advantage.
它们的资本回报率好吗?是的,确实不错,但正在下降,不过它们最近剥离了其中一项业务,所以这可能是它们营业收入下降的部分原因。
Do they have good returns on capital? Yes, they do have them, but they are declining, but they recently gave up one of their businesses, so that may be part of the reason why their operating income has decreased.
那么,与标普500相比,我会给这家公司分配什么样的市盈率?我不关心当前的市盈率。我感兴趣的是,标普指数的历史平均值在15到17之间。这家公司比标普指数中公司的平均水平更好还是更差?我认为更好。
So, what price-to-earnings ratio would I assign to this company compared to the S&P 500? I don't care about the current price-to-earnings ratio. What interests me is that the historical average for the S&P index is between 15 and 17.
Is this company better or worse than the average of companies in the S&P index? I think it's better.
现在,在我写下14、18和22之前,我要改一下。我会选择15、19、15、18和21。最后,我追求的目标回报率是多少?朋友们,为了教学目的,我想向你们解释这项商业活动的价值。因此,我输入了9.5%的历史市场回报率。
记住,这不是我愿意支付的价格,也不是我希望得到的回报。我一直建议人们——这是我的观点——如果你想买入单只股票,你需要一个高于市场回报率的回报。否则,我们干脆买一只低成本的标普500指数交易所交易基金来投资就好了。何必费这么多麻烦和时间去买单家公司的股票呢?
Now, before I write 14, 18 and 22, I will change this. I will choose 15, 19, 15, 18, and 21. Finally, what return am I aiming for? Now, my friends, for the purpose of education, I want to explain to you the value of this business activity.
Therefore, I entered the historical market return of 9.5%. Remember, this is not the price I am willing to pay, nor the return I am hoping for. I always advise people, and this is my opinion, that if you want to buy an individual stock, you need a return that is higher than the market return.
Otherwise, we will simply buy a low-cost S&P 500 index exchange-traded fund and invest in it. Why waste all this trouble and time buying shares in an individual company?
因此,我输入了9.5%的回报率,没有安全边际。然后我按下了分析按钮。股价是453。我得到的低价是240,高价是460,平均价是335。
Therefore, I entered a return of 9.5% with no safety margin. Then I pressed the analyze button. The stock price is 453. I have a low price of 240, a high price of 460, and an average price of 335.
这意味着什么?如果达到我的平均预期,我将获得约5.5%的折现现金流回报。如果达到我的较低预期,回报将在1.2%左右。如果达到我的较高预期,我将获得9.6%的回报。
What does this mean? Well, if our average expectations are met, I will achieve a discounted cash return of approximately 5.5%. If my lower expectations are met, the return will be around 1.2%.
If my higher expectations are met, I will achieve a return of 9.6%.
所以,你得问问自己:为了我最好情况下的9.6%回报,值得冒这个险吗?当然,计算得你自己来做。我们这里还增加了一个功能,可以根据你的预测,向你展示10年后的预期收入和利润。所以,这是一种判断什么看起来现实、什么不现实的方法,因为很多人投入了30%的资金,然后发现10年后公司应该实现十倍于现在的销售额,而这并不现实。
So, you have to ask yourself: Is it worth risking a 9.6% return based on my best-case scenario? Of course, you have to do the calculations yourself. We have also added a feature here that will show you, based on your projections, the expected revenue and profits after 10 years.
So, this is one way to form an idea of what seems realistic or unrealistic, because many people invest 30% of their money, then discover that after 10 years the company should be achieving sales ten times greater, and this is unrealistic.
这个频道对 $SPGI 的历次判断
Everything Money 在这只股票上共 2 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。