Nike 是一个强势品牌,但增长为负且未来市盈率偏高;投资者只有在估值合理时才应买入,以避免表现不佳。
逐段跳播
Nike在这方面没有成功。我想让我们谈谈Nike的数据,各位,因为昨天收盘后它们并不令人印象深刻。
Nike did not succeed in that. I want us to talk about Nike's numbers , guys, because they weren't impressive after the market closed yesterday.
Nike。这些公司正在挣扎,而它们挣扎的主要原因并不是那些拥有大量可支配资金的消费者,而是那些没有的消费者,对吧?
Nike. These companies are struggling, and they are struggling mostly not because of consumers who have a lot of discretionary money, but because of consumers who don't, right?
作为一名投资者,作为这个世界上意识到许多人正艰难维持生计的人,这意味着存在一些买入机会。其中一些公司非常出色,而且变得非常便宜,它们的表现超过了它们所处的市场。
As an investor, as someone in this world who is aware of the fact that many people are struggling to make ends meet, that means there are some buying opportunities. Some of those companies are amazing and get really cheap, and they outperform the markets they operate in.
这是宏观经济的事情,不是吗?现在宏观经济疲弱,遭受痛苦的不是单个公司,而是那些下滑的板块,而这些公司的表现超过了它们所在的板块。
That's a macroeconomic thing, isn't it? This macroeconomy is weak now, and it is not individual companies that are suffering , but rather the sectors that have declined, and these companies are outperforming their sectors.
现在,问题在于:存在很好的机会,但就宏观经济而言,你不知道要过多久情况才会恢复正常并再次改善,从而让你作为投资者能够获利。
Now, here’s the thing: there are great opportunities, but when it comes to the macroeconomy, you don’t know how long it will take before things return to normal and improve again so that you can make profits as an investor.
休息之后,我们将谈谈Nike的最新业绩。Nike昨天收盘后公布了财报,Lou,我觉得这很有意思。对投资者来说有很多教训,但该股较仅仅五年前的峰值已下跌约81%。他们说本季度营收下降了4%,但更糟的是,本财年营收预计将下降一个显著的个位数。看来目前Nike一切都不顺利。
After the break, we will talk about the latest results from Nike . Nike announced its earnings after the market closed yesterday, Lou , I think that's interesting. There are many lessons for investors, but the stock has fallen by about 81% from its peak just five years ago.
They said revenue fell by 4% this quarter, but even worse, revenue is expected to fall by a significant single digit for this fiscal year. It seems that nothing is going well for Nike at the moment.
不,其中一些原因是自身造成的,另一些则超出了它们的控制。我的意思是,这件事有两面。首先,它们判断失误。它们说我们不再需要零售业务。我们将只直接向消费者销售。它们与非常重要的合作伙伴烧毁了许多桥梁,而这仍在给它们带来负面影响。
No, some of these reasons are personal, and others are beyond their control. I mean , there are two sides to this story. Firstly, they miscalculated. They said we no longer need retail trade.
We will only sell directly to consumers. They have burned a lot of bridges with very important partners , and this is still having a negative impact on them.
但我也不知道那是否会改变什么。世界已经变了。你只需要一个有影响力的Instagram网红就能推出一个品牌。这不像1980年代那样,Nike只要把钱砸向大明星就能称霸。现在多了一万亿个品牌,你再也回不到那个时候了。
But I also don't know if that will change anything anyway. The world has changed. You only need one good Instagram influencer to launch a brand. It's not like it was in the 1980s when Nike could just pump money into big stars and dominate.
There are a trillion more brands now, and you'll never get that
这家公司仍然庞大。它仍然是一个好品牌。它会继续存在。它不会再和以前一样,而且每个季度,打击都在继续。
The company is still huge. It's still a good brand. It will continue to exist. It will not be the same as before, and with each quarter, the blows continue.
是的,这仍然是一门卓越而出色的生意。和其他投资者一样,人们很容易纠结于看到一只股票下跌80%就说:“天哪,那是一只会亏钱的股票。”它仍然是一项很棒的业务,但现在一切都与10年、15年或20年前不同了。
Yes, this is still an exceptional and amazing business. Like other investors, it's easy to get hung up on seeing a stock down 80% and say, "Man, that's a losing stock." It's still a great activity, but everything is different now than it was 10, 15 or 20 years ago.
西方市场非常成熟。你知道,如果你回到那个时候,人们并不像现在这样在这些场合穿运动鞋。所以,那块蛋糕已经变大并达到了它的最大规模。现在的增长基本上与GDP同步,不是吗?因此,任何增长快于市场的人,都只是在从别人那里夺取份额。
这意味着Nike在其主要市场已经扮演防御性角色很多年了。
Western markets are very mature. You know, if you go back to that time, people didn't wear sneakers in the same places they wear them now. So, that cake has grown and reached its maximum size.
It's growth that's basically in line with the GDP now, isn't it? Therefore, anyone who grows faster than the market is simply taking a share from someone else. This means that Nike has been playing a defensive role in its main markets for many years already.
所以,如果你把这两件事放在一起,投资者确实应该对像Nike这样的公司抱有正确的预期。我不知道那些预测在4、5年前,或者3年前,或者在2024年一切见顶、估值也达到顶峰时,是否完全一样。
作为一个打破常规的人,别误解我。我非常乐意为一家人人都认为被严重高估的公司支付高估值。但另一边必须存在一个巨大的机会,而目前Nike的业务并非如此。所以,注意这一点,它可能是一家完全不错的公司,但此时你必须支付一个合理的估值,否则你就会走向糟糕的表现。
So, if you put these two things together, investors really should have the right expectations about a company like Nike. I don't know if those predictions were exactly the same 4 or 5 years ago, or 3 years ago, or in 2024 when everything peaked and the valuation also reached its peak.
As a rule-breaker , don't misunderstand me. I am very happy to pay a high rating for a company that everyone thinks is grossly overpriced. But there needs to be a huge opportunity on the other side, and that's not the case for Nike's business at the moment.
So, pay attention to that, it may be a perfectly good company , but at this point you must pay a fair valuation or you are headed for poor performance.
其中一些表现不错,一些则不然。看来Nike正朝着负面方向发展。
Some of them are doing well and some of them are not . It seems that Nike is heading in a negative direction.
让我们从我们刚刚谈到的公司开始。就是Nike。在录制本期节目时,Nike股价目前约为33美元。昨天收盘时的价格为35美元。
Let's start with the company we just talked about. It's Nike. Nike stock is currently trading at around $33 at the time of recording this episode. The price was $35 at yesterday's market close.
Jason,到2030年,Nike的股价会比每股35美元更高还是更低?更高,而且我会说它会接近50美元。那么Travis,你给我的这只股票的复合年增长率是多少?1.18左右,或者差不多这个数。
Jason, in 2030, will Nike's stock be higher or lower than $35 per share? Higher, and I would say it will be closer to $50. So Travis, you're giving me a compound annual growth rate of what?
1.18 here or something like that for this stock.
是的,预期很低,但在过去五年里,这只股票本会大幅亏损。
Yes, expectations are low, but over the past five years this stock would have lost by a large margin.
我认为它会更高。我的意思是,即便是50美元,也许那也跑不赢大盘。我认为它会更高,但它不会跑赢大盘。这挺有意思。我是一个成长型投资者,但我看的却是一家负增长、未来市盈率仍高达23的公司,而我会选择“更低”。
I think it will be higher. I mean, even $50, maybe that doesn't outperform the market. I think it will be higher, but it won't outperform the market. This is funny. I am a growth investor, but I am looking at a company with negative growth and a future P/E ratio that is still 23, and I would have chosen "lower".
我很惊讶你们俩都没有那样做。我认为它会更高的原因是,还是那句话,起点和终点之间的差距,以及如何走到那里。我认为一路上会非常颠簸,但我认为它们会到达一个点,在那里它们会以某种方式重新平衡局面,并拥有自己的优势。
即便它们的利润率继续小幅下滑,它们作为买家的巨大力量依然存在,不是吗?它们从中获得了一些影响力。所以,我认为这会有帮助。那样的规模仍然有用,我仍然认为它会是一家非常赚钱的公司。
我认为投资者的预期也会一路上有所改变,我们会达成一个皆大欢喜的折中,事情会好起来的。
I'm surprised that neither of you did that. The reason I think it will be higher is, again, the difference between the starting point and the end point and how to get there. I think things are going to be really choppy along the way, but I think they'll reach a point where they'll sort of rebalance things, and they'll have their advantage.
Even if their profit margins continue to erode slightly, their enormous power as buyers is still there, isn't it? And they gain some influence from that. So, I think this will help.
That size will still be useful , and I still think it will be a very profitable company. I think investors' expectations will change a little along the way as well, and we will reach a happy compromise where things will be all right.
再加上5%的股息率,目前在我看来这似乎非常安全。
Add to that a 5% dividend yield , which seems very safe to me at the moment.
这个频道对 $NKE 的历次判断
The Motley Fool 在这只股票上共 2 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。